The dynamic interrelationships of diabetes distress uncovered by ecological momentary assessment: a systematic review

Objective This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the application of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in dynamically monitoring diabetes distress, and to examine the dynamic associations between EMA-measured psychosocial or contextual factors and diabetes distress. Methods A systematic search of multiple English and Chinese databases was conducted up to January 13, 2026. Studies were eligible if they employed EMA to dynamically monitor diabetes distress and related psychosocial or contextual factors in individuals with diabetes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Seventeen studies involving a total of 1,807 participants (predominantly with type 1 diabetes) were included. The average EMA completion rate was 84.1%, with lower rates observed among adolescents compared to adults. Subjective glucose perception, the nature of social interactions, sedentary behavior, and physical symptoms showed momentary associations with diabetes distress. Distress was found to prospectively predict subsequent lapses in self-management behaviors and exacerbate negative emotional states. Conclusion EMA is a feasible tool for assessing diabetes distress, effectively capturing its dynamic nature and real-time links with contextual factors. It provides a reference for developing timely and personalized psychological interventions in diabetes care. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251156226 , identifier CRD420251156226.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1793398
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dynamic interrelationships of diabetes distress uncovered by ecological momentary assessment: a systematic review

Xiangrong Liu, Ming Li, Shuang Hu, Yulong Yang et al.
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

The dynamic interrelationships of diabetes distress uncovered by ecological momentary assessment: a systematic review

Xiangrong Liu, Ming Li, Shuang Hu, Yulong Yang, Shili Yang
article en

Abstract

Objective This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the application of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in dynamically monitoring diabetes distress, and to examine the dynamic associations between EMA-measured psychosocial or contextual factors and diabetes distress. Methods A systematic search of multiple English and Chinese databases was conducted up to January 13, 2026. Studies were eligible if they employed EMA to dynamically monitor diabetes distress and related psychosocial or contextual factors in individuals with diabetes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Seventeen studies involving a total of 1,807 participants (predominantly with type 1 diabetes) were included. The average EMA completion rate was 84.1%, with lower rates observed among adolescents compared to adults. Subjective glucose perception, the nature of social interactions, sedentary behavior, and physical symptoms showed momentary associations with diabetes distress. Distress was found to prospectively predict subsequent lapses in self-management behaviors and exacerbate negative emotional states. Conclusion EMA is a feasible tool for assessing diabetes distress, effectively capturing its dynamic nature and real-time links with contextual factors. It provides a reference for developing timely and personalized psychological interventions in diabetes care. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251156226 , identifier CRD420251156226.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 17
Changchun University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.