Staff perceptions of patient self-care in hemodialysis treatment tasks: a qualitative exploration using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment Framework

People with end stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis typically receive treatment in-center, where tasks are mainly performed by healthcare providers with limited patient participation. Incorporating patient participation in performing at least some of the haemodialysis care tasks can enhance safety, efficiency, and quality, yet is rarely performed. Implementing change requires a comprehensive strategy, addressing both patient and provider organizational factors. Using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we examined the factors that may affect a change in the delivery of haemodialysis care and identified potential barriers and facilitators to shifting care provision from a provider-dominant model to a more participatory shared-care approach. Individual semi-structured interviews with managers and staff were conducted to understand their perceptions and insights of patient participation in treatment care tasks in haemodialysis. The interview guide focused on inner context and was built based on the EPIS framework of inner context constructs. Data was analysed with the aid of Atlas.ti using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches to map themes and sub-themes into the EPIS constructs. A total of 36 interviews were conducted in two hospital- and two community-based units with nurses, physicians and managerial personnel. Results are presented according to EPIS constructs, highlighting more barriers than facilitators for implementing patient-shared care. As safety, quality of care, and patient satisfaction were found to be essential aspects of care in all units, implementing increased patient participation requires safety measures, staff education on new nursing approaches, and clear responsibility definitions. Unit settings differed in regulations and protocols. Using EPIS, we identified drivers of implementation success for increasing patient participation in in-center haemodialysis care. These findings are key to inform the design of impactful, scalable, and sustainable programs. Different haemodialysis settings, with varying organizational structures and climate, prioritize patient participation differently. While all units aim for high-quality, efficient, and safe care, the differences in organizational structure and individual adopter characteristics would require significantly different approaches during planning and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14408-2
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staff perceptions of patient self-care in hemodialysis treatment tasks: a qualitative exploration using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment Framework

Alon Antebi, Chava Kurtz, Etty Kruzel-Davila, Tatyana Tsehovsky et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Staff perceptions of patient self-care in hemodialysis treatment tasks: a qualitative exploration using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment Framework

Alon Antebi, Chava Kurtz, Etty Kruzel-Davila, Tatyana Tsehovsky, Efrat Shadmi, Sivan Spitzer
article en

Abstract

People with end stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis typically receive treatment in-center, where tasks are mainly performed by healthcare providers with limited patient participation. Incorporating patient participation in performing at least some of the haemodialysis care tasks can enhance safety, efficiency, and quality, yet is rarely performed. Implementing change requires a comprehensive strategy, addressing both patient and provider organizational factors. Using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we examined the factors that may affect a change in the delivery of haemodialysis care and identified potential barriers and facilitators to shifting care provision from a provider-dominant model to a more participatory shared-care approach. Individual semi-structured interviews with managers and staff were conducted to understand their perceptions and insights of patient participation in treatment care tasks in haemodialysis. The interview guide focused on inner context and was built based on the EPIS framework of inner context constructs. Data was analysed with the aid of Atlas.ti using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches to map themes and sub-themes into the EPIS constructs. A total of 36 interviews were conducted in two hospital- and two community-based units with nurses, physicians and managerial personnel. Results are presented according to EPIS constructs, highlighting more barriers than facilitators for implementing patient-shared care. As safety, quality of care, and patient satisfaction were found to be essential aspects of care in all units, implementing increased patient participation requires safety measures, staff education on new nursing approaches, and clear responsibility definitions. Unit settings differed in regulations and protocols. Using EPIS, we identified drivers of implementation success for increasing patient participation in in-center haemodialysis care. These findings are key to inform the design of impactful, scalable, and sustainable programs. Different haemodialysis settings, with varying organizational structures and climate, prioritize patient participation differently. While all units aim for high-quality, efficient, and safe care, the differences in organizational structure and individual adopter characteristics would require significantly different approaches during planning and implementation.

BMC Health Services Research
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Western Galilee Hospital (IL), Wolfson Medical Center (IL), Fresenius Medical Care (United States) (US), Fresenius Medical Care (Germany) (DE), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.