Evaluation of orthognathic surgery planning with artificial intelligence: a prospective, comparative study

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometric analyses performed by deep learning-based AI programs (NemoCeph 2D, OrthoDx, AudaxCeph, and WebCeph) by comparing their results with the gold standard measurements obtained from 3D CT scans in orthognathic surgery patients. Materials and methodsOrthognathic surgery candidates underwent pretreatment 3D CT scans. These scans were manually analyzed using 3D cephalometric software to establish goldstandard landmark positions. Two-dimensional cephalometric images were then derived from the 3D scans, and deep learning–based AI programs automatically identified the landmarks on these images. The AI-generated measurements were compared with the 3D gold standard, and the differences were analyzed statistically.ResultsWhile the ANB angle showed no significant differences between the methods (p=0.061), other measurements—including SNA, SNB, Wits appraisal, Y Axis Angle, and various facial height ratios—showed significant discrepancies (p<0.05).ConclusionAI-based cephalometric analyses showed notable errors compared with the 3D CT gold standard. These findings suggest that deep learning algorithms require further refinement before they can be reliably used for orthognathic surgery planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Oral Research
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20261702936
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of orthognathic surgery planning with artificial intelligence: a prospective, comparative study

Banu Kılıç, Enes Temizkan, B. Zeynep Yörük
European Oral Research
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Evaluation of orthognathic surgery planning with artificial intelligence: a prospective, comparative study

Banu Kılıç, Enes Temizkan, B. Zeynep Yörük
article en

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometric analyses performed by deep learning-based AI programs (NemoCeph 2D, OrthoDx, AudaxCeph, and WebCeph) by comparing their results with the gold standard measurements obtained from 3D CT scans in orthognathic surgery patients. Materials and methodsOrthognathic surgery candidates underwent pretreatment 3D CT scans. These scans were manually analyzed using 3D cephalometric software to establish goldstandard landmark positions. Two-dimensional cephalometric images were then derived from the 3D scans, and deep learning–based AI programs automatically identified the landmarks on these images. The AI-generated measurements were compared with the 3D gold standard, and the differences were analyzed statistically.ResultsWhile the ANB angle showed no significant differences between the methods (p=0.061), other measurements—including SNA, SNB, Wits appraisal, Y Axis Angle, and various facial height ratios—showed significant discrepancies (p<0.05).ConclusionAI-based cephalometric analyses showed notable errors compared with the 3D CT gold standard. These findings suggest that deep learning algorithms require further refinement before they can be reliably used for orthognathic surgery planning.

European Oral ResearchVol. 60(1)
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.