Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior

Despite a proliferation of research, the behavioral ethics literature remains fragmented, making it difficult for managers to translate findings into practice. A common pitfall is assuming that unethical behaviors that appear identical stem from the same cause and should be managed the same way. Our applied integration addresses this gap by synthesizing the literature into a cohesive, causally driven framework. We identify three core causal pathways—perceptual, regulatory, and calculative—that underlie unethical actions. This framework links these pathways to three distinct forms of misconduct: ethical errors (due to misperception), ethical lapses (due to self-regulatory failure), and ethical violations (due to deliberate calculation). By distinguishing unethical behaviors based on their causal roots, this framework provides a more precise diagnostic tool, enabling managers to implement targeted interventions and advance practical guidance for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of workplace misconduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2024.0236
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior

Ryan Fehr, David Welsh, Grace Ching Chi Ho, C.R. Barnes
Academy of Management Perspectives
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior

Ryan Fehr, David Welsh, Grace Ching Chi Ho, C.R. Barnes
article en

Abstract

Despite a proliferation of research, the behavioral ethics literature remains fragmented, making it difficult for managers to translate findings into practice. A common pitfall is assuming that unethical behaviors that appear identical stem from the same cause and should be managed the same way. Our applied integration addresses this gap by synthesizing the literature into a cohesive, causally driven framework. We identify three core causal pathways—perceptual, regulatory, and calculative—that underlie unethical actions. This framework links these pathways to three distinct forms of misconduct: ethical errors (due to misperception), ethical lapses (due to self-regulatory failure), and ethical violations (due to deliberate calculation). By distinguishing unethical behaviors based on their causal roots, this framework provides a more precise diagnostic tool, enabling managers to implement targeted interventions and advance practical guidance for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of workplace misconduct.

Academy of Management Perspectives
Southern Methodist University (US), University of Washington (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Getting to the Root Causes: An Integrative Framework for Understanding and Mitigating Unethical Workplace Behavior — Ryan Fehr, David Welsh, et al. · Academy of Management Perspectives (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS