The Implementation of Early Intervention Initiatives for Psychosis in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Case Study

Psychosis is a serious mental illness, with onset in adolescence and young adulthood. Few early intervention for psychosis (EIP) programs exist in the Global South, where most of the world's youth live. Addressing this gap requires understanding implementation contexts, pathways, and challenges. This study examines EIP initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and explores implementers' perspectives on scaling them. A single-case study design was employed. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with EIP implementers across LAC and gathered policy documents. Data was coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Twenty-five participants from 10 countries described 26 initiatives, including clinical and research programs, guidelines, and a technical standard. Themes were mapped onto the EPIS framework. In Exploration, participants highlighted key motivators, the influence of collaborations with foreign researchers, contextual adversity (e.g., poverty, stigma), and the role of Indigenous cosmologies and religious traditions in shaping care pathways. In Preparation, they emphasized difficulties in culturally adapting models from high-income countries (HICs), limited staff awareness, and resource shortages. In Implementation, participants described how initiatives operated in local contexts (e.g., research programs offering care to address unmet needs), how they were generally well received by patients and staff, and the shortage of psychosocial interventions. In sustainment, few initiatives persisted; participants pointed to dependence on international funding, limited policy support, capacity, and awareness. While EIP was valued, national dissemination of HIC-based programs was considered unfeasible. EIP development in LAC has occurred amid structural and resource limitations affecting many LMICs. Implementers' proposals-task-shifting; simplified care packages; leveraging extant services; and enhancing early psychosis literacy- represent feasible strategies to support EIP across LAC. Recommendations for future research, including the involvement of service users and their families and the adaptation of implementation frameworks to context, are shared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005531
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implementation of Early Intervention Initiatives for Psychosis in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Case Study

Camila Velez, Srividya N. Iyer, Ruben Valle
PLOS Global Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

The Implementation of Early Intervention Initiatives for Psychosis in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Case Study

Camila Velez, Srividya N. Iyer, Ruben Valle
article en

Abstract

Psychosis is a serious mental illness, with onset in adolescence and young adulthood. Few early intervention for psychosis (EIP) programs exist in the Global South, where most of the world's youth live. Addressing this gap requires understanding implementation contexts, pathways, and challenges. This study examines EIP initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and explores implementers' perspectives on scaling them. A single-case study design was employed. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with EIP implementers across LAC and gathered policy documents. Data was coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Twenty-five participants from 10 countries described 26 initiatives, including clinical and research programs, guidelines, and a technical standard. Themes were mapped onto the EPIS framework. In Exploration, participants highlighted key motivators, the influence of collaborations with foreign researchers, contextual adversity (e.g., poverty, stigma), and the role of Indigenous cosmologies and religious traditions in shaping care pathways. In Preparation, they emphasized difficulties in culturally adapting models from high-income countries (HICs), limited staff awareness, and resource shortages. In Implementation, participants described how initiatives operated in local contexts (e.g., research programs offering care to address unmet needs), how they were generally well received by patients and staff, and the shortage of psychosocial interventions. In sustainment, few initiatives persisted; participants pointed to dependence on international funding, limited policy support, capacity, and awareness. While EIP was valued, national dissemination of HIC-based programs was considered unfeasible. EIP development in LAC has occurred amid structural and resource limitations affecting many LMICs. Implementers' proposals-task-shifting; simplified care packages; leveraging extant services; and enhancing early psychosis literacy- represent feasible strategies to support EIP across LAC. Recommendations for future research, including the involvement of service users and their families and the adaptation of implementation frameworks to context, are shared.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(3)
Douglas College (CA), McGill University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.