Spatiotemporal dynamics for fire type detection: Differentiating lithium-ion battery, benign, and conventional fires

Fire type is a critical determinant of hazard escalation, suppression effectiveness, and emergency response strategy. However, current fire detection systems reduce this complexity to binary fire/no-fire outputs, treating fundamentally different fire phenomena equivalently at the detection stage. This limitation is particularly significant given the recent introduction of Class L fire for lithium-ion battery fires (LIB). Despite advances in deep learning, no established framework enables operational multi-class fire-type differentiation using spatiotemporal video analytics. To address this gap, we present a real-time classification framework leveraging flame motion, smoke evolution, and flicker dynamics. A curated CCTV-based dataset was developed comprising four categories: conventional fires (Classes A–F), LIB fires, benign fires, and non-fire scenes. Among evaluated architectures, the SlowFast network achieved the most consistent performance (accuracy 86.5%, precision 88.5%, recall 86.5%, F1-score 87.0). Temporal analysis and activation heatmaps further support model interpretability. By advancing detection beyond binary alarms toward fire-type differentiation, this work provides a basis for risk-informed response strategies, reduced false alarms, and improved operational handling of LIB-related fire hazards. • Real-time system detects and classifies fire types from surveillance video • Fire type classification leverages fire dynamics and spatiotemporal cues • Categorizes LIB, Conventional (A–F), benign fires and non-fire scenes • SlowFast network achieved 86.5% accuracy with strong generalization • Enabling next-generation adaptive, context-aware fire detection systems • Temporal analysis and heatmaps explain model decisions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Safety Journal
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104789
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatiotemporal dynamics for fire type detection: Differentiating lithium-ion battery, benign, and conventional fires

Murat Buğra TAHTALI, Mohamed Ali, M. Ghodrat
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
article

Spatiotemporal dynamics for fire type detection: Differentiating lithium-ion battery, benign, and conventional fires

Murat Buğra TAHTALI, Mohamed Ali, M. Ghodrat
article en

Abstract

Fire type is a critical determinant of hazard escalation, suppression effectiveness, and emergency response strategy. However, current fire detection systems reduce this complexity to binary fire/no-fire outputs, treating fundamentally different fire phenomena equivalently at the detection stage. This limitation is particularly significant given the recent introduction of Class L fire for lithium-ion battery fires (LIB). Despite advances in deep learning, no established framework enables operational multi-class fire-type differentiation using spatiotemporal video analytics. To address this gap, we present a real-time classification framework leveraging flame motion, smoke evolution, and flicker dynamics. A curated CCTV-based dataset was developed comprising four categories: conventional fires (Classes A–F), LIB fires, benign fires, and non-fire scenes. Among evaluated architectures, the SlowFast network achieved the most consistent performance (accuracy 86.5%, precision 88.5%, recall 86.5%, F1-score 87.0). Temporal analysis and activation heatmaps further support model interpretability. By advancing detection beyond binary alarms toward fire-type differentiation, this work provides a basis for risk-informed response strategies, reduced false alarms, and improved operational handling of LIB-related fire hazards. • Real-time system detects and classifies fire types from surveillance video • Fire type classification leverages fire dynamics and spatiotemporal cues • Categorizes LIB, Conventional (A–F), benign fires and non-fire scenes • SlowFast network achieved 86.5% accuracy with strong generalization • Enabling next-generation adaptive, context-aware fire detection systems • Temporal analysis and heatmaps explain model decisions

Fire Safety JournalVol. 162
University of Canberra (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.