Comparative Efficacy of Bulevirtide, Interferons, and Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Chronic Hepatitis Delta: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Background Chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) continues to be a global health concern, and the infection remains challenging to treat. Over the past few decades, pegylated interferons, typically in combination with therapy for hepatitis B, have become the standard of care, with considerable side effects and frequently unsatisfactory results. Several new therapies are emerging, including bulevirtide and lonafarnib. We conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of bulevirtide, interferons, and nucleos(t)ide analogs, alone or in combination, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis D. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized interventional studies assessing HDV RNA suppression, biochemical response, combined response, and histological improvement with various therapies. NMA was performed using a frequentist random‐effects model. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and forest plots were generated. Results Thirteen studies ( n = 922) were included, studying nine possible treatment arms. At the end of treatment, 31.8% achieved a virological response. Bulevirtide monotherapy (OR 38.63, p < 0.05) and combinations with NA (OR 69.36, p < 0.05) and peginterferon alpha (OR 260.08, p < 0.05) significantly suppressed HDV RNA, with the bulevirtide–peginterferon alpha combination having the highest HDV RNA suppression. At ≥ 24‐week follow‐up, no regimen maintained significant HDV RNA suppression. Biochemical response was achieved in 42.7% at the end of treatment; however, no group reached statistical significance versus control, though bulevirtide and its combination with peginterferon alpha outperformed peginterferon alpha alone. Combined response was highest with bulevirtide–peginterferon alpha (OR 112.69, p < 0.05), followed by bulevirtide monotherapy. Histological response (five studies, n = 183) was not statistically significant with any intervention compared with control. Conclusion Bulevirtide and peginterferon alpha combination therapy may offer the most promising treatment for chronic hepatitis D. More studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this regimen and establish the optimum dose and duration of treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hepatology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijh/6325996
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Bulevirtide, Interferons, and Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Chronic Hepatitis Delta: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Rohan Karkra, Ethan Shamsian, Zaid Tafesh, Paul J. Gaglio et al.
International Journal of Hepatology
Hepatitis C virus research
article

Comparative Efficacy of Bulevirtide, Interferons, and Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Chronic Hepatitis Delta: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Rohan Karkra, Ethan Shamsian, Zaid Tafesh, Paul J. Gaglio, Mahinaz Mohsen, Michael Bebawy, Steven Rella, Joshua E. Pagán-Busigó
article en

Abstract

Background Chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) continues to be a global health concern, and the infection remains challenging to treat. Over the past few decades, pegylated interferons, typically in combination with therapy for hepatitis B, have become the standard of care, with considerable side effects and frequently unsatisfactory results. Several new therapies are emerging, including bulevirtide and lonafarnib. We conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of bulevirtide, interferons, and nucleos(t)ide analogs, alone or in combination, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis D. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized interventional studies assessing HDV RNA suppression, biochemical response, combined response, and histological improvement with various therapies. NMA was performed using a frequentist random‐effects model. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and forest plots were generated. Results Thirteen studies ( n = 922) were included, studying nine possible treatment arms. At the end of treatment, 31.8% achieved a virological response. Bulevirtide monotherapy (OR 38.63, p < 0.05) and combinations with NA (OR 69.36, p < 0.05) and peginterferon alpha (OR 260.08, p < 0.05) significantly suppressed HDV RNA, with the bulevirtide–peginterferon alpha combination having the highest HDV RNA suppression. At ≥ 24‐week follow‐up, no regimen maintained significant HDV RNA suppression. Biochemical response was achieved in 42.7% at the end of treatment; however, no group reached statistical significance versus control, though bulevirtide and its combination with peginterferon alpha outperformed peginterferon alpha alone. Combined response was highest with bulevirtide–peginterferon alpha (OR 112.69, p < 0.05), followed by bulevirtide monotherapy. Histological response (five studies, n = 183) was not statistically significant with any intervention compared with control. Conclusion Bulevirtide and peginterferon alpha combination therapy may offer the most promising treatment for chronic hepatitis D. More studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this regimen and establish the optimum dose and duration of treatment.

International Journal of HepatologyVol. 2026(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.