The Demand for Government Debt

We document that the sectoral composition and marginal buyers of government debt differ notably across jurisdictions and over time. We use instrumental variables derived from monetary policy surprises to estimate the demand elasticities of various sectors. In the United States, commercial banks and mutual funds exhibit the most price-elastic demand, whereas the foreign official sector has a price-inelastic demand. Based on these estimates and under certain assumptions, we find that a 1% increase in the Central Bank holdings of U.S. Treasuries results in an around 8- to 13-basis-point drop in long-term yields depending on the market composition. Elasticities of individual sectors do not differ in a statistically significant manner when the Central Bank share in the Treasury market increases or decreases. However, different market compositions during various quantitative easing (QE) and quantitative tightening (QT) programs have led to an asymmetric effect with the impact of QE on yields being greater than that of QT. Our results suggest that, overall, the demand for U.S. Treasuries is considerably more elastic than for equities, corporate bonds, and emerging market sovereign bonds found in the literature. We also repeat the analysis for other jurisdictions and compare estimates for different sectors. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00332 .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00332
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Demand for Government Debt

Management Science
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

The Demand for Government Debt

article en

Abstract

We document that the sectoral composition and marginal buyers of government debt differ notably across jurisdictions and over time. We use instrumental variables derived from monetary policy surprises to estimate the demand elasticities of various sectors. In the United States, commercial banks and mutual funds exhibit the most price-elastic demand, whereas the foreign official sector has a price-inelastic demand. Based on these estimates and under certain assumptions, we find that a 1% increase in the Central Bank holdings of U.S. Treasuries results in an around 8- to 13-basis-point drop in long-term yields depending on the market composition. Elasticities of individual sectors do not differ in a statistically significant manner when the Central Bank share in the Treasury market increases or decreases. However, different market compositions during various quantitative easing (QE) and quantitative tightening (QT) programs have led to an asymmetric effect with the impact of QE on yields being greater than that of QT. Our results suggest that, overall, the demand for U.S. Treasuries is considerably more elastic than for equities, corporate bonds, and emerging market sovereign bonds found in the literature. We also repeat the analysis for other jurisdictions and compare estimates for different sectors. This paper was accepted by Lukas Schmid, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.00332 .

Management Science
Bank for International Settlements (CH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Demand for Government Debt · Management Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS