VLMs struggle to extract definitions of structural segments from MSA images: toward the design of a human-in-the-loop annotation pipeline for the PDB-Descriptome project

We investigate the ability of vision-language models (VLMs) to extract structural region definitions from rasterized multiple sequence alignment (MSA) images, as part of the PDB-Descriptome project. Using synthetic MSAs with annotated structural biological entities (SBEs) and structural biological Referring Expressions (SBREs), we evaluate two VLMs, gemini-2.5-flash and gemini-2.5-pro, under naïve and strict prompts. While VLMs perform well in SBRE extraction, they show poor accuracy in defining SBE boundaries. In contrast, a human annotator achieves high boundary precision with slightly lower textual accuracy. These results support a human-in-the-loop pipeline for reliable structure-text annotation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genomics & Informatics
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44342-025-00061-4
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VLMs struggle to extract definitions of structural segments from MSA images: toward the design of a human-in-the-loop annotation pipeline for the PDB-Descriptome project

Koya Sakuma
Genomics & Informatics
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

VLMs struggle to extract definitions of structural segments from MSA images: toward the design of a human-in-the-loop annotation pipeline for the PDB-Descriptome project

Koya Sakuma
article en

Abstract

We investigate the ability of vision-language models (VLMs) to extract structural region definitions from rasterized multiple sequence alignment (MSA) images, as part of the PDB-Descriptome project. Using synthetic MSAs with annotated structural biological entities (SBEs) and structural biological Referring Expressions (SBREs), we evaluate two VLMs, gemini-2.5-flash and gemini-2.5-pro, under naïve and strict prompts. While VLMs perform well in SBRE extraction, they show poor accuracy in defining SBE boundaries. In contrast, a human annotator achieves high boundary precision with slightly lower textual accuracy. These results support a human-in-the-loop pipeline for reliable structure-text annotation.

Genomics & Informatics
Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.