Management of the Extreme Situation in the Climate Change Zone (Republic of Serbia): Criticism, Political-Ecological Perspective, and Complexitas Rerum

This paper analyzes the perception of climate-related risks and emergency management capacities in the Toplica District (Republic of Serbia) through a critical political-ecological lens, drawing on the concept of complexitas rerum as a heuristic framework for understanding the interdependent relations among environmental processes, social structures, and institutional configurations of power. Extreme climate-related phenomena, particularly forest fires, are not treated as isolated natural events, but as socially mediated outcomes of interacting climatic, economic, and institutional factors that shape local vulnerability and adaptive capacity. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey of 180 respondents with qualitative insights from a contextual analysis of the regional socio-ecological setting. Empirical findings indicate a high perceived increase in forest fire frequency, strong awareness of climate change impacts, and widespread perceptions of insufficient institutional preparedness and response capacity. At the same time, results highlight the coexistence of individual adaptive strategies and a relatively weak reliance on formal institutional protection mechanisms, particularly in rural and peripheral communities. The paper critically engages with technocratic and depoliticized approaches to disaster and risk management, emphasizing the gap between formal institutional frameworks (de iure) and their practical implementation (de facto) in the context of available resources and capacities. It also highlights how climate risks are socially distributed, with marginalized rural populations experiencing higher exposure and lower access to institutional support. By integrating empirical survey data, regional contextual analysis, and political-ecological theory, the study demonstrates that climate change in the Toplica District is not merely an environmental phenomenon, but a complex socio-political process that reinforces existing inequalities. In this sense, the framework of political ecology, grounded in complexitas rerum, contributes to a more nuanced understanding of emergency management and supports the development of more equitable and locally grounded adaptation strategies amid increasing climate uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19238704
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of the Extreme Situation in the Climate Change Zone (Republic of Serbia): Criticism, Political-Ecological Perspective, and Complexitas Rerum

Tomić Miloš
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Management of the Extreme Situation in the Climate Change Zone (Republic of Serbia): Criticism, Political-Ecological Perspective, and Complexitas Rerum

Tomić Miloš
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the perception of climate-related risks and emergency management capacities in the Toplica District (Republic of Serbia) through a critical political-ecological lens, drawing on the concept of complexitas rerum as a heuristic framework for understanding the interdependent relations among environmental processes, social structures, and institutional configurations of power. Extreme climate-related phenomena, particularly forest fires, are not treated as isolated natural events, but as socially mediated outcomes of interacting climatic, economic, and institutional factors that shape local vulnerability and adaptive capacity. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey of 180 respondents with qualitative insights from a contextual analysis of the regional socio-ecological setting. Empirical findings indicate a high perceived increase in forest fire frequency, strong awareness of climate change impacts, and widespread perceptions of insufficient institutional preparedness and response capacity. At the same time, results highlight the coexistence of individual adaptive strategies and a relatively weak reliance on formal institutional protection mechanisms, particularly in rural and peripheral communities. The paper critically engages with technocratic and depoliticized approaches to disaster and risk management, emphasizing the gap between formal institutional frameworks (de iure) and their practical implementation (de facto) in the context of available resources and capacities. It also highlights how climate risks are socially distributed, with marginalized rural populations experiencing higher exposure and lower access to institutional support. By integrating empirical survey data, regional contextual analysis, and political-ecological theory, the study demonstrates that climate change in the Toplica District is not merely an environmental phenomenon, but a complex socio-political process that reinforces existing inequalities. In this sense, the framework of political ecology, grounded in complexitas rerum, contributes to a more nuanced understanding of emergency management and supports the development of more equitable and locally grounded adaptation strategies amid increasing climate uncertainty.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Belgrade (RS)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.