Evaluation of risk factor-based machine learning models for predicting early childhood caries: A systematic review

Objectives: To evaluate machine learning models used for predicting early childhood caries and identify key risk factors contributing to model performance. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across major databases up to July 2025. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using PROBAST+AI tool. Model types, datasets, performance metrics, and validation strategies were analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Random forest models were most frequently used. Model accuracy ranged from 70% to 95%. Dental plaque and active caries lesions were the most consistent predictors. External validation was limited across studies. Conclusions: Machine learning shows strong potential for ECC risk prediction; however, standardized reporting and external validation are essential for clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr_202637s1_abs_173
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of risk factor-based machine learning models for predicting early childhood caries: A systematic review

Mohammad Atif, Imam Azam, Saima Yunus Khan
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Evaluation of risk factor-based machine learning models for predicting early childhood caries: A systematic review

Mohammad Atif, Imam Azam, Saima Yunus Khan
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate machine learning models used for predicting early childhood caries and identify key risk factors contributing to model performance. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across major databases up to July 2025. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using PROBAST+AI tool. Model types, datasets, performance metrics, and validation strategies were analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Random forest models were most frequently used. Model accuracy ranged from 70% to 95%. Dental plaque and active caries lesions were the most consistent predictors. External validation was limited across studies. Conclusions: Machine learning shows strong potential for ECC risk prediction; however, standardized reporting and external validation are essential for clinical translation.

Indian Journal of Dental ResearchVol. 37(Suppl 1)
Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.