CAP 2023-2027: Can the Fruit and Vegetable Model address the Challenges of Olive Producer Organizations?

Despite long-standing European support, Producer Organizations (POs) have struggled to ensure farmer participation and aggregate production outside the fruit and vegetable (F&V) sector, where marketing obligations are absent. This study evaluates the extension of the F&V PO model to Italy’s olive sector under the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Applying hybrid institution theory and a discrete choice experiment, we assess farmers’ preferences for PO services, including co-investment and risk mitigation. Results reveal preference heterogeneity and a structural risk of interdependence between participation, service quality, and production. Findings inform targeted PO design and contribute to post-2027 CAP debates on scaling collective models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy Modeling
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.107044
Primary Topic
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAP 2023-2027: Can the Fruit and Vegetable Model address the Challenges of Olive Producer Organizations?

Maria Rosaria Pupo D’Andrea, Francesco Caracciolo, Camilla Tamborrino, Alessandro Sorrentino et al.
Journal of Policy Modeling
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
article

CAP 2023-2027: Can the Fruit and Vegetable Model address the Challenges of Olive Producer Organizations?

Maria Rosaria Pupo D’Andrea, Francesco Caracciolo, Camilla Tamborrino, Alessandro Sorrentino, Roberto Henke, Luca Cacchiarelli
article en

Abstract

Despite long-standing European support, Producer Organizations (POs) have struggled to ensure farmer participation and aggregate production outside the fruit and vegetable (F&V) sector, where marketing obligations are absent. This study evaluates the extension of the F&V PO model to Italy’s olive sector under the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Applying hybrid institution theory and a discrete choice experiment, we assess farmers’ preferences for PO services, including co-investment and risk mitigation. Results reveal preference heterogeneity and a structural risk of interdependence between participation, service quality, and production. Findings inform targeted PO design and contribute to post-2027 CAP debates on scaling collective models.

Journal of Policy Modeling
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), Cereal Research Centre (IT), Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.