Technical Agility and Systems Thinking in the Delivery of Military Simulation Training

Background. Modern Defence forces require adaptable training and simulation environments capable of responding rapidly to shifting operational and geopolitical demands. Legacy, sequential acquisition models often limit responsiveness. Simulation-enabled training, if delivered through agile, system-based practices, can improve readiness and interoperability across Defence domains. Objective. This study examines how the integration of Team and Technical Agility (TTA) and Systems Thinking, operationalised through the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) and reinforced by generative leadership cultures, can enhance Defence simulation delivery and align capability outcomes with the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) and National Defence Strategy (NDS) imperatives. Methods. Using practice-based qualitative analysis, experiential Defence case studies were synthesised and compared against criteria derived from open-source literature workflow efficiency, adaptability, and interoperability. Each case was evaluated to identify how organisational culture and leadership behaviours affected delivery outcomes. Results. Case studies that embedded TTA within SAFe demonstrated faster integration cycles, improved reliability, and stronger cultural alignment with mission needs. Conversely, traditional sequential programs exhibited delays and reduced adaptability. Conclusions. Empowered leadership, cadence-based planning, and DevSecOps-enabled workflows underpin the responsiveness required for future Defence simulation. Embedding technical agility and systems thinking transforms simulation from a support function into a mission-critical capability, enabling joint and coalition readiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation & Gaming
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781261437540
Primary Topic
Military Strategy and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Agility and Systems Thinking in the Delivery of Military Simulation Training

Allison Quilliam, Gregory Quilliam
Simulation & Gaming
Military Strategy and Technology
article

Technical Agility and Systems Thinking in the Delivery of Military Simulation Training

Allison Quilliam, Gregory Quilliam
article en

Abstract

Background. Modern Defence forces require adaptable training and simulation environments capable of responding rapidly to shifting operational and geopolitical demands. Legacy, sequential acquisition models often limit responsiveness. Simulation-enabled training, if delivered through agile, system-based practices, can improve readiness and interoperability across Defence domains. Objective. This study examines how the integration of Team and Technical Agility (TTA) and Systems Thinking, operationalised through the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) and reinforced by generative leadership cultures, can enhance Defence simulation delivery and align capability outcomes with the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) and National Defence Strategy (NDS) imperatives. Methods. Using practice-based qualitative analysis, experiential Defence case studies were synthesised and compared against criteria derived from open-source literature workflow efficiency, adaptability, and interoperability. Each case was evaluated to identify how organisational culture and leadership behaviours affected delivery outcomes. Results. Case studies that embedded TTA within SAFe demonstrated faster integration cycles, improved reliability, and stronger cultural alignment with mission needs. Conversely, traditional sequential programs exhibited delays and reduced adaptability. Conclusions. Empowered leadership, cadence-based planning, and DevSecOps-enabled workflows underpin the responsiveness required for future Defence simulation. Embedding technical agility and systems thinking transforms simulation from a support function into a mission-critical capability, enabling joint and coalition readiness.

Simulation & Gaming
LabCorp (United States) (US), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Military Strategy and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.