Cancer genetic testing uptake in the primary care setting: Patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators throughout the testing process

Genetic testing for gene variants associated with hereditary cancers can help with cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment. However, testing has not been well integrated into primary care settings where its preventative impact can be realized. To explore patient-level barriers and facilitators throughout the genetic testing process in primary care settings, we conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 31 patients within the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) study who had not completed the risk assessment (n = 2), had completed the risk assessment but were ineligible (n = 8), had declined testing (n = 10), and had completed testing (n = 11). Interviewees were broadly interested in genetic testing. Those who did not complete the risk assessment cited limited access to technology, exacerbated by health and financial struggles. Several interviewees who completed the risk assessment but were deemed ineligible for testing indicated that their lack of knowledge about biological relatives prevented complete responses to the risk assessment. Those who opted out of testing cited concerns over privacy, insurance discrimination, and potential psychological burden. Notably, the majority who declined testing were unsure if they would refuse again in the future, and three went on to request genetic testing after being invited to complete an interview. Those who changed their minds about testing stated changes in life circumstances (such as obtaining life insurance) that facilitated openness to testing. Patients who completed testing shared similar concerns to those who declined but were motivated by their familial cancer history and believed genetic testing could lead to preventative options. A key finding of this study was that patient readiness for testing changed over relatively brief follow-up times. These results highlight the need for practicable approaches to re-offering genetic testing to individuals over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70195
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer genetic testing uptake in the primary care setting: Patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators throughout the testing process

DaLaina Cameron, Susan Brown Trinidad, Emerson J. Dusic, Elizabeth M. Swisher et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Cancer genetic testing uptake in the primary care setting: Patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators throughout the testing process

DaLaina Cameron, Susan Brown Trinidad, Emerson J. Dusic, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Faith Beers, Catharine Wang, Tesla N. Theoryn, Sarah Knerr, Heather Harris
article en

Abstract

Genetic testing for gene variants associated with hereditary cancers can help with cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment. However, testing has not been well integrated into primary care settings where its preventative impact can be realized. To explore patient-level barriers and facilitators throughout the genetic testing process in primary care settings, we conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 31 patients within the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) study who had not completed the risk assessment (n = 2), had completed the risk assessment but were ineligible (n = 8), had declined testing (n = 10), and had completed testing (n = 11). Interviewees were broadly interested in genetic testing. Those who did not complete the risk assessment cited limited access to technology, exacerbated by health and financial struggles. Several interviewees who completed the risk assessment but were deemed ineligible for testing indicated that their lack of knowledge about biological relatives prevented complete responses to the risk assessment. Those who opted out of testing cited concerns over privacy, insurance discrimination, and potential psychological burden. Notably, the majority who declined testing were unsure if they would refuse again in the future, and three went on to request genetic testing after being invited to complete an interview. Those who changed their minds about testing stated changes in life circumstances (such as obtaining life insurance) that facilitated openness to testing. Patients who completed testing shared similar concerns to those who declined but were motivated by their familial cancer history and believed genetic testing could lead to preventative options. A key finding of this study was that patient readiness for testing changed over relatively brief follow-up times. These results highlight the need for practicable approaches to re-offering genetic testing to individuals over time.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 35(2)
Boston University (US), University of Washington (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.