A question of dignity? Intersectional perspectives on the establishment of old people’s homes in Sweden at the turn of the 20th century

Care for older persons is a universal issue, but around 1900, new groups of wage-earners created a need for an age of retirement, forming a new era of institutional care. These old people’s homes were often charitable trusts, which required them to be seen as respectable to attract funding. Residents therefore faced a two-way contract: being offered dignified housing if they met societal standards of worthiness. Through a quali­tative analysis, this article shows how such institutions needed to distin­guish themselves from poorhouses, how their economies could be a mix of private and public funding and how they contributed to disciplining old age. Gothenburg Old People’s Home is used as an illustrative example to show how the image of old people’s homes was negotiated in terms of dignity, intersecting with class, gender and age whilst the upholding of social order-shaped notions of equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.5709
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A question of dignity? Intersectional perspectives on the establishment of old people’s homes in Sweden at the turn of the 20th century

Helene Castenbrandt, Ulrika Nilsson
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

A question of dignity? Intersectional perspectives on the establishment of old people’s homes in Sweden at the turn of the 20th century

Helene Castenbrandt, Ulrika Nilsson
article en

Abstract

Care for older persons is a universal issue, but around 1900, new groups of wage-earners created a need for an age of retirement, forming a new era of institutional care. These old people’s homes were often charitable trusts, which required them to be seen as respectable to attract funding. Residents therefore faced a two-way contract: being offered dignified housing if they met societal standards of worthiness. Through a quali­tative analysis, this article shows how such institutions needed to distin­guish themselves from poorhouses, how their economies could be a mix of private and public funding and how they contributed to disciplining old age. Gothenburg Old People’s Home is used as an illustrative example to show how the image of old people’s homes was negotiated in terms of dignity, intersecting with class, gender and age whilst the upholding of social order-shaped notions of equality.

International Journal of Ageing and Later Life
Lund University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.