Comparison of the health-related outcomes for traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn cigarettes and snus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tobacco products using is a global public health problem. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assessed the health-related outcomes associated with acute and chronic using of traditional cigarettes (TCs), e-cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and snus. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched by the terms: ‘cigarette’, ‘conventional cigarette’, ‘ENDS’, ‘electronic nicotine delivery system’, ‘electronic cigarette’, ‘e-cigarette’, ‘heat-not-burn product’, ‘heat-not-burn cigarette’, ‘tobacco heating product’, ‘heated tobacco product’, ‘snus’, ‘Swedish snuff’, ‘oral nicotine pouches’, ‘nicotine pouches’, ‘health’, ‘health effect’, ‘health impact’. Random effects model was used to calculate effect sizes. I2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of studies. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to assess publication bias. Statistical analysis of the data was performed in R (version 4.2.2). Acute exposure to analyzed tobacco products significantly affects heart rate (MD = 6.78; 95% CI [4.86; 8.69]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 49%). Chronic exposure to such tobacco products significantly affects triglycerides level (MD = 18.09; 95% CI [6.12; 30.07]; p = 0.003; I2 = 62%), systolic blood pressure (MD = 6.99; 95% CI [1.62; 12.37]; p = 0.01; I2 = 78%) and diastolic blood pressure (MD = 5.2; 95% CI [2.27; 8.13]; p = 0.0005; I2 = 54%). There was a greater odds of cancer with chronic smoking by 32% (OR = 1.32; 95% CI [1.08; 1.61]; p = 0.009; I2 = 92%). We have shown that former smokers have a 5% higher chance of developing cancer, while current smokers have an increased chance by as much as 61%. Robust evidence supports adverse health effects of traditional cigarettes, whereas evidence for alternative products remains limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, longitudinal studies involving individuals exclusively using conventional and alternative tobacco products should be performed in the future. The study protocol of this systematic review was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number CRD420251062406.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27067-z
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the health-related outcomes for traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn cigarettes and snus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Paulina Natalia Kopa-Stojak, Marharyta Sobczak, Rafał Pawliczak
BMC Public Health
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Comparison of the health-related outcomes for traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn cigarettes and snus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Paulina Natalia Kopa-Stojak, Marharyta Sobczak, Rafał Pawliczak
article en

Abstract

Tobacco products using is a global public health problem. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assessed the health-related outcomes associated with acute and chronic using of traditional cigarettes (TCs), e-cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and snus. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched by the terms: ‘cigarette’, ‘conventional cigarette’, ‘ENDS’, ‘electronic nicotine delivery system’, ‘electronic cigarette’, ‘e-cigarette’, ‘heat-not-burn product’, ‘heat-not-burn cigarette’, ‘tobacco heating product’, ‘heated tobacco product’, ‘snus’, ‘Swedish snuff’, ‘oral nicotine pouches’, ‘nicotine pouches’, ‘health’, ‘health effect’, ‘health impact’. Random effects model was used to calculate effect sizes. I2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of studies. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to assess publication bias. Statistical analysis of the data was performed in R (version 4.2.2). Acute exposure to analyzed tobacco products significantly affects heart rate (MD = 6.78; 95% CI [4.86; 8.69]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 49%). Chronic exposure to such tobacco products significantly affects triglycerides level (MD = 18.09; 95% CI [6.12; 30.07]; p = 0.003; I2 = 62%), systolic blood pressure (MD = 6.99; 95% CI [1.62; 12.37]; p = 0.01; I2 = 78%) and diastolic blood pressure (MD = 5.2; 95% CI [2.27; 8.13]; p = 0.0005; I2 = 54%). There was a greater odds of cancer with chronic smoking by 32% (OR = 1.32; 95% CI [1.08; 1.61]; p = 0.009; I2 = 92%). We have shown that former smokers have a 5% higher chance of developing cancer, while current smokers have an increased chance by as much as 61%. Robust evidence supports adverse health effects of traditional cigarettes, whereas evidence for alternative products remains limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, longitudinal studies involving individuals exclusively using conventional and alternative tobacco products should be performed in the future. The study protocol of this systematic review was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number CRD420251062406.

BMC Public Health
Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.