Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children on peritoneal dialysis: a review and European practice survey

Prescribing an adequate intraperitoneal dialysate volume is essential in peritoneal dialysis (PD) to balance optimal solute and fluid removal against the risk of increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) and to prevent increased reabsorption and mechanical complications. Since the description of manual hydrostatic IPP measurement (IPPM) in children in 1996, a few small observational studies in children and adults have provided limited evidence on the acceptable upper limit of IPP and associated complications. We conducted a practice survey across European pediatric dialysis centers, which showed that of the responding 47 centers, 68% routinely perform IPPM, but the frequency, mode of measurement, accepted upper limit of IPP, and interpretation of IPPM results vary considerably. In this narrative review, we present the current knowledge on IPP and the rationale for a standardized three-point IPPM, a prerequisite to obtain valid scientific data on the relation of IPP with patient outcome, e.g., by means of registries and adequately powered prospective studies. To date, the role of IPPM in improving outcomes for children on PD is uncertain. Advanced, continuous IPPM technologies providing precise, large-scale IPP data together with PD efficiency and tolerability data will improve our understanding of the impact of IPP on patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Nephrology
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-026-07233-6
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children on peritoneal dialysis: a review and European practice survey

Alberto Edefonti, B. Ranchin, Johan Vandewalle, Ariane Zaloszyc et al.
Pediatric Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children on peritoneal dialysis: a review and European practice survey

Alberto Edefonti, B. Ranchin, Johan Vandewalle, Ariane Zaloszyc, Claus Peter Schmitt, Rukshana Shroff
article en

Abstract

Prescribing an adequate intraperitoneal dialysate volume is essential in peritoneal dialysis (PD) to balance optimal solute and fluid removal against the risk of increased intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) and to prevent increased reabsorption and mechanical complications. Since the description of manual hydrostatic IPP measurement (IPPM) in children in 1996, a few small observational studies in children and adults have provided limited evidence on the acceptable upper limit of IPP and associated complications. We conducted a practice survey across European pediatric dialysis centers, which showed that of the responding 47 centers, 68% routinely perform IPPM, but the frequency, mode of measurement, accepted upper limit of IPP, and interpretation of IPPM results vary considerably. In this narrative review, we present the current knowledge on IPP and the rationale for a standardized three-point IPPM, a prerequisite to obtain valid scientific data on the relation of IPP with patient outcome, e.g., by means of registries and adequately powered prospective studies. To date, the role of IPPM in improving outcomes for children on PD is uncertain. Advanced, continuous IPPM technologies providing precise, large-scale IPP data together with PD efficiency and tolerability data will improve our understanding of the impact of IPP on patient outcomes.

Pediatric Nephrology
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Heidelberg University (DE), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Ghent University Hospital (BE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), University College London (GB), Heidelberg University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.