Implementing 3D Geometry of a Coronal Mass Ejection in the Drag‐Based Model

Abstract The drag‐based model (DBM) is a simple and widely used analytical tool for predicting the arrival time and speed of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) throughout the heliosphere. The current DBM is two‐dimensional; we extend it to three dimensions by applying a non‐self‐similar cone geometry in both the equatorial and meridional planes. Tests on synthetic samples reveal clear differences between the 2D and 3D implementations, with the latter providing more accurate arrival predictions. Application to real CME‐ICME pairs shows improvement over the 2D version, though smaller than expected, likely due to sample bias and input uncertainties. The key advantage of the 3D DBM is its enhanced hit/miss analysis, especially for CMEs with latitudes away from the ecliptic plane. In terms of arrival time, the most notable improvement is the removal of the 2D DBM's systematic underestimation of ICME transit times. Finally, both 2D and 3D DBM were found to perform similarly to other forecast models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Weather
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025sw004750
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing 3D Geometry of a Coronal Mass Ejection in the Drag‐Based Model

Karmen Martinić, D. Sudar, Galina Chikunova, B. Vršnak et al.
Space Weather
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Implementing 3D Geometry of a Coronal Mass Ejection in the Drag‐Based Model

Karmen Martinić, D. Sudar, Galina Chikunova, B. Vršnak, Jaša Čalogović, Mateja Dumbović, Manuela Temmer, S. Lulić, A. K. Remeshan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The drag‐based model (DBM) is a simple and widely used analytical tool for predicting the arrival time and speed of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) throughout the heliosphere. The current DBM is two‐dimensional; we extend it to three dimensions by applying a non‐self‐similar cone geometry in both the equatorial and meridional planes. Tests on synthetic samples reveal clear differences between the 2D and 3D implementations, with the latter providing more accurate arrival predictions. Application to real CME‐ICME pairs shows improvement over the 2D version, though smaller than expected, likely due to sample bias and input uncertainties. The key advantage of the 3D DBM is its enhanced hit/miss analysis, especially for CMEs with latitudes away from the ecliptic plane. In terms of arrival time, the most notable improvement is the removal of the 2D DBM's systematic underestimation of ICME transit times. Finally, both 2D and 3D DBM were found to perform similarly to other forecast models.

Space WeatherVol. 24(3)
University of Graz (AT), University of Zagreb (HR), Karlovac University of Applied Sciences (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementing 3D Geometry of a Coronal Mass Ejection in the Drag‐Based Model — Karmen Martinić, D. Sudar, et al. · Space Weather (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS