Domesticity in Precarity

Abstract Histories of child removal have primarily focused on settler colonies, rather than other kinds of colonies. In British India, the separation of children from the Sansi population—a socially marginalized, low-caste, and itinerant group that was designated under colonial law as a “criminal tribe”—has not yet received the attention of historians. The story of Sansi child removal suggests that precarity can be both disruptive andproductive of domesticity, and furthermore, that precarity is often an ordinary part of domestic life. Methodologically, this article proposes the framework of “domesticity in precarity.” Histories of domesticity need to hold together the structural constraints on domestic life with the efforts of people to make many and varied relationships and households in conditions of precarity. Above all, interrogating the relationship between domesticity and precarity widens our view of the relationships and spaces that historically constituted the “domestic.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Historical Review
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhag001
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domesticity in Precarity

Jessica Hinchy
The American Historical Review
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Domesticity in Precarity

Jessica Hinchy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Histories of child removal have primarily focused on settler colonies, rather than other kinds of colonies. In British India, the separation of children from the Sansi population—a socially marginalized, low-caste, and itinerant group that was designated under colonial law as a “criminal tribe”—has not yet received the attention of historians. The story of Sansi child removal suggests that precarity can be both disruptive andproductive of domesticity, and furthermore, that precarity is often an ordinary part of domestic life. Methodologically, this article proposes the framework of “domesticity in precarity.” Histories of domesticity need to hold together the structural constraints on domestic life with the efforts of people to make many and varied relationships and households in conditions of precarity. Above all, interrogating the relationship between domesticity and precarity widens our view of the relationships and spaces that historically constituted the “domestic.”

The American Historical ReviewVol. 131(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.