Association Between Nurses’ Work Practice Environment and Their Learning Agility: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Introduction In Saudi Arabia, nurses operate in a complex healthcare environment, characterized by a highly diverse expatriate workforce, rapid digital transformation (including the widespread adoption of electronic health records), and ongoing staffing shortages. Despite increasing demands for adaptability, Learning Agility among nurses appears suboptimal, and limited research has examined how the work practice environment supports this capability in Saudi hospitals. This study examined nurses’ work practice environment, Learning Agility, and the factors associated with them. Method A cross‐sectional descriptive design was used. A convenience sample of 375 nurses was recruited from three Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Riyadh and Jeddah between December 2022 and March 2023. Data were collected using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index and the Marmara Learning Agility Scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the Shaqra University Ethics Research Committee and participating institutions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Results The mean Practice Environment Scale score was 2.89 (SD = 0.73, maximum = 4), with “Nursing foundation for quality of care” rated the highest (mean = 3.13, SD = 0.79) and “Staff and resource adequacy” the lowest (mean = 2.73, SD = 0.91), indicating resource and staffing challenges. The mean Learning Agility score was 3.67 (SD = 0.73, maximum = 5), with the highest dimension being “Result agility” (mean = 3.89, SD = 0.75). Strong predictors of Learning Agility included nurse participation in hospital affairs, nursing foundation for quality of care, and collegial nurse–physician relationships, while a negative association between “Staff and resource adequacy” and Change Agility and between “Nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses” and Result Agility/Self‐awareness were noted. Conclusion A significant association was identified between nurses’ work practice environment and Learning Agility. Addressing staffing and resource adequacy, strengthening leadership support, promoting interprofessional collaboration, and enhancing participation in decision‐making may foster adaptive capacity. These findings have implications for care quality and organizational resilience in rapidly evolving healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Forum
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/nuf/1708166
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Nurses’ Work Practice Environment and Their Learning Agility: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Cheryl Codiase Danglipen, Jonas Preposi Cruz, Nahed Alquwez, Jinalyn Vicente-Pascua et al.
Nursing Forum
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Association Between Nurses’ Work Practice Environment and Their Learning Agility: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Cheryl Codiase Danglipen, Jonas Preposi Cruz, Nahed Alquwez, Jinalyn Vicente-Pascua, Joseph Uy Almazan, Ejercito Mangawa Balay-Odao
article en

Abstract

Introduction In Saudi Arabia, nurses operate in a complex healthcare environment, characterized by a highly diverse expatriate workforce, rapid digital transformation (including the widespread adoption of electronic health records), and ongoing staffing shortages. Despite increasing demands for adaptability, Learning Agility among nurses appears suboptimal, and limited research has examined how the work practice environment supports this capability in Saudi hospitals. This study examined nurses’ work practice environment, Learning Agility, and the factors associated with them. Method A cross‐sectional descriptive design was used. A convenience sample of 375 nurses was recruited from three Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Riyadh and Jeddah between December 2022 and March 2023. Data were collected using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index and the Marmara Learning Agility Scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the Shaqra University Ethics Research Committee and participating institutions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Results The mean Practice Environment Scale score was 2.89 (SD = 0.73, maximum = 4), with “Nursing foundation for quality of care” rated the highest (mean = 3.13, SD = 0.79) and “Staff and resource adequacy” the lowest (mean = 2.73, SD = 0.91), indicating resource and staffing challenges. The mean Learning Agility score was 3.67 (SD = 0.73, maximum = 5), with the highest dimension being “Result agility” (mean = 3.89, SD = 0.75). Strong predictors of Learning Agility included nurse participation in hospital affairs, nursing foundation for quality of care, and collegial nurse–physician relationships, while a negative association between “Staff and resource adequacy” and Change Agility and between “Nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses” and Result Agility/Self‐awareness were noted. Conclusion A significant association was identified between nurses’ work practice environment and Learning Agility. Addressing staffing and resource adequacy, strengthening leadership support, promoting interprofessional collaboration, and enhancing participation in decision‐making may foster adaptive capacity. These findings have implications for care quality and organizational resilience in rapidly evolving healthcare systems.

Nursing ForumVol. 2026(1)
Shaqra University (SA), University of the Cordilleras (PH), Saint Louis University (PH), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.