Considering Preference‐Based Patient Participation—Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool

The 4Ps is a means for evaluating preference-based patient participation, though the matching of ordinal measures for preferences and experiences requires a careful and well-informed approach to planning and executing data collection and statistical analyses. As an outcome measure of interventions to facilitate more person-centred healthcare, researchers and clinicians should recognise theoretical and conceptual conditions. This enhances a recognition of patients' voice and choice; patients and staff can agree on how best to make use of resources and needs, improving health and healthcare engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70423
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering Preference‐Based Patient Participation—Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool

Ann Catrine Eldh, Marcus Bendtsen
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Considering Preference‐Based Patient Participation—Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool

Ann Catrine Eldh, Marcus Bendtsen
article en

Abstract

The 4Ps is a means for evaluating preference-based patient participation, though the matching of ordinal measures for preferences and experiences requires a careful and well-informed approach to planning and executing data collection and statistical analyses. As an outcome measure of interventions to facilitate more person-centred healthcare, researchers and clinicians should recognise theoretical and conceptual conditions. This enhances a recognition of patients' voice and choice; patients and staff can agree on how best to make use of resources and needs, improving health and healthcare engagement.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 32(2)
Linköping University (SE), Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considering Preference‐Based Patient Participation—Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool — Ann Catrine Eldh, Marcus Bendtsen · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS