Complicating Student Pathways through the Interfaith Learning and Development Framework

Abstract: This study sought to empirically test and validate the interfaith learning and development (ILD) framework, a theoretical model composed of institutional and individual components that shape college students’ interfaith learning and development outcomes. Using data from a national longitudinal study, path analysis models were constructed to test the fit of the theoretical ILD framework with regard to development of students’ self-authored worldview commitment in college. Multiple-group path analysis was applied to examine differences in ILD pathways for students holding majority, minoritized, and nonreligious worldview identities. Implications for advancing theory and research, particularly with regard to student experiences and minoritized religious, spiritual, and secular identities are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of college student development
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2026.a986510
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complicating Student Pathways through the Interfaith Learning and Development Framework

Christa Winkler, Matthew J. Mayhew
Journal of college student development
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Complicating Student Pathways through the Interfaith Learning and Development Framework

Christa Winkler, Matthew J. Mayhew
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This study sought to empirically test and validate the interfaith learning and development (ILD) framework, a theoretical model composed of institutional and individual components that shape college students’ interfaith learning and development outcomes. Using data from a national longitudinal study, path analysis models were constructed to test the fit of the theoretical ILD framework with regard to development of students’ self-authored worldview commitment in college. Multiple-group path analysis was applied to examine differences in ILD pathways for students holding majority, minoritized, and nonreligious worldview identities. Implications for advancing theory and research, particularly with regard to student experiences and minoritized religious, spiritual, and secular identities are discussed.

Journal of college student developmentVol. 67(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.