Workshop Report: Disproportionate Collapse Resilience of Mass Timber Buildings

Virginia Tech convened a workshop on October 24, 2025 to identify state-of-the-art challenges and research needs for mitigating disproportionate collapse in multi-story mass timber and timber-hybrid buildings. The workshop included an overview presentation by Professors Phillips and Jacques followed by a facilitated discussion structured around open-ended questions on current practice, common building configurations, connection data gaps, modeling challenges, and research priorities. Key findings: • In practice, disproportionate-collapse evaluation is most commonly pursued for tall Risk Category III/IV projects; federal facilities may also require it, but mass timber is less frequently selected for those buildings. • At-risk mass timber buildings typically use reinforced concrete core walls or steel braced frames for the lateral system, with post-and-plate (often residential) or post-and-beam (often commercial) gravity framing. Diaphragms are often cantilevers off a central core. • Connection and diaphragm detailing is dominated by nailed splines, coil straps/surface-mounted plates for ties, and proprietary concealed beam-to-column connectors. Standardized strength–rotation–stiffness properties are largely unavailable, leading to highly variable modeling practices. • Applying ASCE/SEI 76 to mass timber is limited by lack of validated connection/subassembly data; reliance on ASCE/SEI 41 does not resolve this because timber-specific parameters remain insufficient—creating a circular gap in guidance. • Dynamic/high strain-rate effects in column-loss scenarios are poorly characterized for mass timber. Recommended research priorities: • Large-scale connection tests with sustained axial load to quantify rotational capacity under combined demands. • New connection systems with high rotation capacity and reliable post-yield axial capacity (with concealed/fire-compatible detailing). • Dynamic and high strain-rate effects in progressive-collapse response (connection- and system-level). • Diaphragm panel/joint layout studies to better mobilize two-way cross-laminated timber (CLT) action and improve load redistribution. • Standardize connection performance data and expand ASCE/SEI 76 with a mass timber section comparable in specificity to steel.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2026-03-22
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workshop Report: Disproportionate Collapse Resilience of Mass Timber Buildings

Adam R. Phillips, Eric Jacques, Reuben Raharja
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Wood Treatment and Properties
article

Workshop Report: Disproportionate Collapse Resilience of Mass Timber Buildings

Adam R. Phillips, Eric Jacques, Reuben Raharja
article en

Abstract

Virginia Tech convened a workshop on October 24, 2025 to identify state-of-the-art challenges and research needs for mitigating disproportionate collapse in multi-story mass timber and timber-hybrid buildings. The workshop included an overview presentation by Professors Phillips and Jacques followed by a facilitated discussion structured around open-ended questions on current practice, common building configurations, connection data gaps, modeling challenges, and research priorities. Key findings: • In practice, disproportionate-collapse evaluation is most commonly pursued for tall Risk Category III/IV projects; federal facilities may also require it, but mass timber is less frequently selected for those buildings. • At-risk mass timber buildings typically use reinforced concrete core walls or steel braced frames for the lateral system, with post-and-plate (often residential) or post-and-beam (often commercial) gravity framing. Diaphragms are often cantilevers off a central core. • Connection and diaphragm detailing is dominated by nailed splines, coil straps/surface-mounted plates for ties, and proprietary concealed beam-to-column connectors. Standardized strength–rotation–stiffness properties are largely unavailable, leading to highly variable modeling practices. • Applying ASCE/SEI 76 to mass timber is limited by lack of validated connection/subassembly data; reliance on ASCE/SEI 41 does not resolve this because timber-specific parameters remain insufficient—creating a circular gap in guidance. • Dynamic/high strain-rate effects in column-loss scenarios are poorly characterized for mass timber. Recommended research priorities: • Large-scale connection tests with sustained axial load to quantify rotational capacity under combined demands. • New connection systems with high rotation capacity and reliable post-yield axial capacity (with concealed/fire-compatible detailing). • Dynamic and high strain-rate effects in progressive-collapse response (connection- and system-level). • Diaphragm panel/joint layout studies to better mobilize two-way cross-laminated timber (CLT) action and improve load redistribution. • Standardize connection performance data and expand ASCE/SEI 76 with a mass timber section comparable in specificity to steel.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wood Treatment and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.