Routine Placement of Prophylactic Drain Versus Non-Use of Drain in Patients Undergoing Emergency Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Botswana: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract To evaluate the efficacy of the transperitoneal drains in reducing the onset of the postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and surgical-site infection (SSI) following emergency open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The study assessed whether utilization of drain was associated with adverse outcomes leading to prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare expenditure. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at the Nyangabgwe Referral Hospital, carried out from December 2022 to September 2023. The study included all patients aged 16-years-old and over, with complicated appendicitis, and who underwent emergency open appendectomy. Patients with uncomplicated appendicitis and those scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy were excluded. Altogether, 263 participants were consented for the trial, of whom 128 were randomized into the drainage (DG), and 135 into the non-drainage (NDG) groups. A total of 118 patients (44.87%) developed postoperative SSI (DG: 81.35%; NDG: 18.64%; p = 0.001). The length of hospital stay (LOS) was found to be longer in patients with transperitoneal drains than those without (DG: 6 days; NDG: 4 days; p = 0.001). There were three patients (1.14%) who underwent relook laparotomies, two from the DG and one from the NDG (p = 0.304). There was no risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation between patients belonging to the DG (N = 128) and those in the NDG (N = 135; p < 0.0001). Overall, no mortality was registered in both study groups. Routine placement of prophylactic transperitoneal drain in patients with complicated appendicitis who undergo emergency open appendectomy shows no statistical improvement over non-usage and, generally, does not avert the onset of postoperative SSI, ileus, or fecal fistula. Moreover, drain usage was linked to prolonged length of hospital stay and increased total healthcare expenditure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Coloproctology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1817783
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Placement of Prophylactic Drain Versus Non-Use of Drain in Patients Undergoing Emergency Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Botswana: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sefu Juma Uledi
Journal of Coloproctology
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Routine Placement of Prophylactic Drain Versus Non-Use of Drain in Patients Undergoing Emergency Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Botswana: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sefu Juma Uledi
article en

Abstract

Abstract To evaluate the efficacy of the transperitoneal drains in reducing the onset of the postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and surgical-site infection (SSI) following emergency open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The study assessed whether utilization of drain was associated with adverse outcomes leading to prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare expenditure. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at the Nyangabgwe Referral Hospital, carried out from December 2022 to September 2023. The study included all patients aged 16-years-old and over, with complicated appendicitis, and who underwent emergency open appendectomy. Patients with uncomplicated appendicitis and those scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy were excluded. Altogether, 263 participants were consented for the trial, of whom 128 were randomized into the drainage (DG), and 135 into the non-drainage (NDG) groups. A total of 118 patients (44.87%) developed postoperative SSI (DG: 81.35%; NDG: 18.64%; p = 0.001). The length of hospital stay (LOS) was found to be longer in patients with transperitoneal drains than those without (DG: 6 days; NDG: 4 days; p = 0.001). There were three patients (1.14%) who underwent relook laparotomies, two from the DG and one from the NDG (p = 0.304). There was no risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation between patients belonging to the DG (N = 128) and those in the NDG (N = 135; p < 0.0001). Overall, no mortality was registered in both study groups. Routine placement of prophylactic transperitoneal drain in patients with complicated appendicitis who undergo emergency open appendectomy shows no statistical improvement over non-usage and, generally, does not avert the onset of postoperative SSI, ileus, or fecal fistula. Moreover, drain usage was linked to prolonged length of hospital stay and increased total healthcare expenditure.

Journal of ColoproctologyVol. 46(01)
Nyangabgwe Referral Hospital (BW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.