Fostering cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary peer review of teaching in health sciences programs

Purpose: The education of future health professionals brings with it a diversity of programs, the requirements for effective work-integrated learning experiences, and best use of discipline and clinical expertise. Peer review of teaching (PRT) is one mechanism whereby interdisciplinary connections are built to improve the quality of teaching and learning. This article introduces a novel perspective on the PRT process and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. Methods: The Health Sciences Special Interest Group within the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia initiated a cross-institutional PRT which included seven educators of varying academic experience from six Australian academic institutions. Upon completion of the PRT, each educator undertook a written reflection using six prompts to guide consistency. Results: Our findings highlighted the value of cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary PRT. We have learned from each other and gained more appreciation for the effort educators put into teaching and learning design that is meaningful and impactful for student learning, which is one of the main foci of the process. Conclusion: Building on our experiences, we propose a cross-institutional, crossdisciplinary approach to PRT that moves beyond traditional intra-institutional models. This approach enriches pedagogical insights, enhances objectivity, and fosters more critical feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Professions Education
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55890/2452-3011.1394
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary peer review of teaching in health sciences programs

David van Reyk, Snezana Kusljic, Roma Forbes, Nicole B. Reinke et al.
Health Professions Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Fostering cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary peer review of teaching in health sciences programs

David van Reyk, Snezana Kusljic, Roma Forbes, Nicole B. Reinke, Tania N. Crotti, Sophie Paquet-Fifield, Nidhish Francis
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The education of future health professionals brings with it a diversity of programs, the requirements for effective work-integrated learning experiences, and best use of discipline and clinical expertise. Peer review of teaching (PRT) is one mechanism whereby interdisciplinary connections are built to improve the quality of teaching and learning. This article introduces a novel perspective on the PRT process and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. Methods: The Health Sciences Special Interest Group within the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia initiated a cross-institutional PRT which included seven educators of varying academic experience from six Australian academic institutions. Upon completion of the PRT, each educator undertook a written reflection using six prompts to guide consistency. Results: Our findings highlighted the value of cross-institutional and cross-disciplinary PRT. We have learned from each other and gained more appreciation for the effort educators put into teaching and learning design that is meaningful and impactful for student learning, which is one of the main foci of the process. Conclusion: Building on our experiences, we propose a cross-institutional, crossdisciplinary approach to PRT that moves beyond traditional intra-institutional models. This approach enriches pedagogical insights, enhances objectivity, and fosters more critical feedback.

Health Professions EducationVol. 12(2)
Charles Sturt University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.