A Scale‐Invariant Learning Model for Distributed Practice Effects

Despite their potential to significantly improve the durability of learning and their proven predictive power on many occasions, theories of distributed practice have not yet been widely adopted by educators. The reluctance may be attributed to the enormous strain they impose on learners or the fragmented nature of the evidence, as well as the generality of available prescriptions. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to propose a unified theoretical model for the effects of practice, forgetting and spacing, which to this day unfortunately still does not exist; and (2) to put this new model to the test in multiple realistic situations. To achieve the first objective, scale invariance was used as a unifying principle and applied to three distinct scales. This approach resulted in a parsimonious equation for the general case of scale-invariant learning (SIL). For the second objective, the model was tested on a large dataset obtained during a locally conducted experiment. In addition, it was applied to five other datasets extracted from reputable and well-known distributed practice experiments. Overall, the goodness of fit of the SIL was acceptable in all cases. It is argued that the SIL model, to the best of our knowledge, appears to be a very robust model. The model allows the same general function to be used for any sequence of tasks-be they simple, complex, short, long, unique, repeated or elaborate. Therefore, it enables strict and real-world application in authentic situations, while proposing an invariant unit of measurement for learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Science
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70200
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scale‐Invariant Learning Model for Distributed Practice Effects

Patrice Potvin, Martin Riopel
Cognitive Science
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

A Scale‐Invariant Learning Model for Distributed Practice Effects

Patrice Potvin, Martin Riopel
article en

Abstract

Despite their potential to significantly improve the durability of learning and their proven predictive power on many occasions, theories of distributed practice have not yet been widely adopted by educators. The reluctance may be attributed to the enormous strain they impose on learners or the fragmented nature of the evidence, as well as the generality of available prescriptions. The aim of this study is twofold: (1) to propose a unified theoretical model for the effects of practice, forgetting and spacing, which to this day unfortunately still does not exist; and (2) to put this new model to the test in multiple realistic situations. To achieve the first objective, scale invariance was used as a unifying principle and applied to three distinct scales. This approach resulted in a parsimonious equation for the general case of scale-invariant learning (SIL). For the second objective, the model was tested on a large dataset obtained during a locally conducted experiment. In addition, it was applied to five other datasets extracted from reputable and well-known distributed practice experiments. Overall, the goodness of fit of the SIL was acceptable in all cases. It is argued that the SIL model, to the best of our knowledge, appears to be a very robust model. The model allows the same general function to be used for any sequence of tasks-be they simple, complex, short, long, unique, repeated or elaborate. Therefore, it enables strict and real-world application in authentic situations, while proposing an invariant unit of measurement for learning.

Cognitive ScienceVol. 50(3)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.