Eventful Palaeography: Oxford Bodleian Library MS, Tanner 10 and Writing as a Social Practice

Abstract Although Oxford, Bodleian Library, Tanner 10 has been studied extensively, unresolved questions remain regarding its localization, its repair, the contemporaneity of the scribes, and the variations between their work. Framing an approach via eventful palaeography and writing as a social practice, this essay raises questions about the use of evolutionary metaphors and systems of classification borrowed from the natural sciences to describe manuscripts. It argues that a complete understanding of Tanner 10 has been hampered by the limited treatment of scribes three, four and five. This essay re-examines Tanner 10 thoroughly – with equal attention to the work of all five scribes – to argue that Scribes 1, 2, 4 and 5 were working contemporaneously, and that some similarities between Scribes 1 and 5 have been overlooked. It then provides arguments for dating Scribe 3’s intervention to the second half of the tenth century, possibly in Dorchester or Abingdon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Medieval England and its Neighbours
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ean.2025.10005
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eventful Palaeography: Oxford Bodleian Library MS, Tanner 10 and Writing as a Social Practice

Sharon M. Rowley
Early Medieval England and its Neighbours
Medieval Literature and History
article

Eventful Palaeography: Oxford Bodleian Library MS, Tanner 10 and Writing as a Social Practice

Sharon M. Rowley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although Oxford, Bodleian Library, Tanner 10 has been studied extensively, unresolved questions remain regarding its localization, its repair, the contemporaneity of the scribes, and the variations between their work. Framing an approach via eventful palaeography and writing as a social practice, this essay raises questions about the use of evolutionary metaphors and systems of classification borrowed from the natural sciences to describe manuscripts. It argues that a complete understanding of Tanner 10 has been hampered by the limited treatment of scribes three, four and five. This essay re-examines Tanner 10 thoroughly – with equal attention to the work of all five scribes – to argue that Scribes 1, 2, 4 and 5 were working contemporaneously, and that some similarities between Scribes 1 and 5 have been overlooked. It then provides arguments for dating Scribe 3’s intervention to the second half of the tenth century, possibly in Dorchester or Abingdon.

Early Medieval England and its NeighboursVol. 52
Christopher Newport University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.