Autonomy ought-is gap and its potential solution: a call for ‘autonomy consultants’ in modern healthcare

Respect for patient autonomy is a fundamental principle in healthcare and medical ethics. However, empirical evidence reveals a persistent gap between ethical standards and their practical implementation. Autonomy requires more than obtaining informed consent—it can also involve supporting deliberation, clarifying preferences, engaging with family members, assessing decision-making competence, interpreting advance directives and reconstructing presumed wishes. These tasks are complex, time-consuming and demand specialised skills that many healthcare professionals lack. To address this challenge, we propose the establishment of a new professional role: autonomy consultant . This role aims to bridge the gap between ethical requirements and current practice by distributing responsibility beyond existing clinical roles. We outline the potential tasks and competencies of autonomy consultants and discuss anticipated challenges. While unconventional, our proposal underscores the importance of ensuring that patient autonomy is genuinely respected and promoted in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JME Practical Bioethics
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jmepb-2026-000117
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomy ought-is gap and its potential solution: a call for ‘autonomy consultants’ in modern healthcare

Joar Björk, Anna Hirsch
JME Practical Bioethics
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Autonomy ought-is gap and its potential solution: a call for ‘autonomy consultants’ in modern healthcare

Joar Björk, Anna Hirsch
article en

Abstract

Respect for patient autonomy is a fundamental principle in healthcare and medical ethics. However, empirical evidence reveals a persistent gap between ethical standards and their practical implementation. Autonomy requires more than obtaining informed consent—it can also involve supporting deliberation, clarifying preferences, engaging with family members, assessing decision-making competence, interpreting advance directives and reconstructing presumed wishes. These tasks are complex, time-consuming and demand specialised skills that many healthcare professionals lack. To address this challenge, we propose the establishment of a new professional role: autonomy consultant . This role aims to bridge the gap between ethical requirements and current practice by distributing responsibility beyond existing clinical roles. We outline the potential tasks and competencies of autonomy consultants and discuss anticipated challenges. While unconventional, our proposal underscores the importance of ensuring that patient autonomy is genuinely respected and promoted in healthcare.

JME Practical BioethicsVol. 2(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Swedish Institute (SE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Autonomy ought-is gap and its potential solution: a call for ‘autonomy consultants’ in modern healthcare — Joar Björk, Anna Hirsch · JME Practical Bioethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS