Economic Evaluation of Particle Therapy for Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

Particle therapy represents a cutting-edge modality in radiation oncology that offers potential advantages over conventional radiation therapy; however, its cost-effectiveness has not been established. We conducted a systematic search of several electronic databases to synthesize contemporary evidence on the cost-effectiveness of particle therapy. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, and reported outcomes on costs, health benefits, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. We identified 57 studies, which collectively reported 134 comparisons for particle therapies. In general, studies were of good quality, although better reporting of data sources and modeling assumptions is warranted. Included studies primarily evaluated the cost-effectiveness of proton therapy, used photon therapy as the comparator, utilized a Markov Cohort model, and used the payer's perspective. Findings were inconsistent, with the reported ICERs ranging from $55 to $1,066,266 per unit of benefit gained, with discrepancies across cancer sites and treatment modalities. Particle therapy is cost-effective for specific groups but may not be universally cost-effective. More research is warranted to identify subgroups for which particle therapy is cost-effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cancer Journal
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ppo.0000000000000815
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Evaluation of Particle Therapy for Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

Iakovos Toumazis, Sara Nofal, Alex Elliott, Mehdi Hemmati et al.
The Cancer Journal
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Economic Evaluation of Particle Therapy for Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

Iakovos Toumazis, Sara Nofal, Alex Elliott, Mehdi Hemmati, Maria A. Lopez-Olivo, Seyyed M.M.J. Sarayi, David P. Farris, Samuel Garvin, Ethan N. Maldonado
article en

Abstract

Particle therapy represents a cutting-edge modality in radiation oncology that offers potential advantages over conventional radiation therapy; however, its cost-effectiveness has not been established. We conducted a systematic search of several electronic databases to synthesize contemporary evidence on the cost-effectiveness of particle therapy. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, and reported outcomes on costs, health benefits, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. We identified 57 studies, which collectively reported 134 comparisons for particle therapies. In general, studies were of good quality, although better reporting of data sources and modeling assumptions is warranted. Included studies primarily evaluated the cost-effectiveness of proton therapy, used photon therapy as the comparator, utilized a Markov Cohort model, and used the payer's perspective. Findings were inconsistent, with the reported ICERs ranging from $55 to $1,066,266 per unit of benefit gained, with discrepancies across cancer sites and treatment modalities. Particle therapy is cost-effective for specific groups but may not be universally cost-effective. More research is warranted to identify subgroups for which particle therapy is cost-effective.

The Cancer JournalVol. 32(2)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.