Beef cattle producers’ knowledge about and preferences for carbon contracts

• Carbon contracts have gained attention as a way to incentivize carbon-emissions reduction for the agricultural sector, particularly among beef-cattle producers. • Our study utilized data from a survey of 222 beef cattle producers in the southeastern United States to examine their knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding carbon contracts. • Survey respondents demonstrated a lack of accurate knowledge about carbon markets and contract specifications, with many overestimating the price of carbon. • Among the most common barriers to signing contracts were the cost of altering practices, the duration, and insufficient payments. • Further, our results indicated that producers require an additional $103.74/hectare ($42/acre) to accept a 15-year contract compared to a 5-year contract, and they prefer a fixed payment structure, requiring an additional $24.70/hectare ($10/acre) if the contract has a fluctuating price structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rangelands
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2026.01.002
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beef cattle producers’ knowledge about and preferences for carbon contracts

Anastasia W. Thayer, Nathan M. Smith, Michael Vassalos, Zuyi Wang et al.
Rangelands
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Beef cattle producers’ knowledge about and preferences for carbon contracts

Anastasia W. Thayer, Nathan M. Smith, Michael Vassalos, Zuyi Wang, Jordan M. Shockley, Felipe De Figueiredo Silva
article en

Abstract

• Carbon contracts have gained attention as a way to incentivize carbon-emissions reduction for the agricultural sector, particularly among beef-cattle producers. • Our study utilized data from a survey of 222 beef cattle producers in the southeastern United States to examine their knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding carbon contracts. • Survey respondents demonstrated a lack of accurate knowledge about carbon markets and contract specifications, with many overestimating the price of carbon. • Among the most common barriers to signing contracts were the cost of altering practices, the duration, and insufficient payments. • Further, our results indicated that producers require an additional $103.74/hectare ($42/acre) to accept a 15-year contract compared to a 5-year contract, and they prefer a fixed payment structure, requiring an additional $24.70/hectare ($10/acre) if the contract has a fluctuating price structure.

Rangelands
University of Jordan (JO), Smith Family (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.