Beyond the PaO2/FiO2 ratio: Rethinking ARDS severity through the Lens of physiology

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome encompassing distinct physiological and biological patterns of lung injury. Despite this heterogeneity, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ) remains the cornerstone of ARDS definitions, severity classification, and clinical decision-making. While its simplicity has facilitated widespread use, the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio incompletely reflects the underlying physiological mechanisms of hypoxemia and should not be interpreted as a stand-alone marker of disease severity. The PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio is highly sensitive to ventilator settings, particularly positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), exhibits nonlinear behavior at high inspired oxygen fractions, and provides only a static assessment of gas-exchange. Consequently, it fails to capture key dimensions of ARDS pathophysiology, including lung recruitability, mechanical heterogeneity, and the temporal evolution of injury and response to therapy. These limitations are increasingly relevant in contemporary intensive care, where ventilatory strategies and adjunctive therapies actively modify oxygenation independent of structural lung injury. In this narrative review, we critically re-examine the physiological assumptions underlying the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio and evaluate its role in current ARDS practice. We synthesize evidence supporting alternative and complementary oxygenation metrics, such as PEEP-adjusted indices, the oxygenation index, and composite measures including the ROX index (SpO 2 /FiO 2 adjusted for respiratory rate), emphasizing their physiological rationale, clinical interpretability, and practical limitations at the bedside. These metrics are discussed not as replacements, but as tools that may refine the contextual interpretation of hypoxemia. Beyond static oxygenation measures, we explore emerging paradigms that conceptualize ARDS severity as a dynamic, multidimensional construct, integrating longitudinal oxygenation trajectories with respiratory mechanics, imaging-based assessment of lung aeration, and biomarker-informed biological subphenotypes. Repositioning the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio within this integrated physiological and biological framework may improve patient stratification, enhance the coherence of therapeutic decision-making, in line with the translational goals of modern intensive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Intensive Care
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100057
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the PaO2/FiO2 ratio: Rethinking ARDS severity through the Lens of physiology

Basil Jouryyeh, Sarah Al Sharie, Saif Azzam, Patricia R.M. Rocco et al.
Annals of Intensive Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Beyond the PaO2/FiO2 ratio: Rethinking ARDS severity through the Lens of physiology

Basil Jouryyeh, Sarah Al Sharie, Saif Azzam, Patricia R.M. Rocco, Mudhaffer Touqan, Lou’I Al-Husinat, Mohammad Trdeh, Marcus J. Schultz, Ala’ Alomari, Denise Battaglini, Raghad Khamis, Prashant Nasa
article en

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome encompassing distinct physiological and biological patterns of lung injury. Despite this heterogeneity, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ) remains the cornerstone of ARDS definitions, severity classification, and clinical decision-making. While its simplicity has facilitated widespread use, the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio incompletely reflects the underlying physiological mechanisms of hypoxemia and should not be interpreted as a stand-alone marker of disease severity. The PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio is highly sensitive to ventilator settings, particularly positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), exhibits nonlinear behavior at high inspired oxygen fractions, and provides only a static assessment of gas-exchange. Consequently, it fails to capture key dimensions of ARDS pathophysiology, including lung recruitability, mechanical heterogeneity, and the temporal evolution of injury and response to therapy. These limitations are increasingly relevant in contemporary intensive care, where ventilatory strategies and adjunctive therapies actively modify oxygenation independent of structural lung injury. In this narrative review, we critically re-examine the physiological assumptions underlying the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio and evaluate its role in current ARDS practice. We synthesize evidence supporting alternative and complementary oxygenation metrics, such as PEEP-adjusted indices, the oxygenation index, and composite measures including the ROX index (SpO 2 /FiO 2 adjusted for respiratory rate), emphasizing their physiological rationale, clinical interpretability, and practical limitations at the bedside. These metrics are discussed not as replacements, but as tools that may refine the contextual interpretation of hypoxemia. Beyond static oxygenation measures, we explore emerging paradigms that conceptualize ARDS severity as a dynamic, multidimensional construct, integrating longitudinal oxygenation trajectories with respiratory mechanics, imaging-based assessment of lung aeration, and biomarker-informed biological subphenotypes. Repositioning the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio within this integrated physiological and biological framework may improve patient stratification, enhance the coherence of therapeutic decision-making, in line with the translational goals of modern intensive care.

Annals of Intensive CareVol. 16
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), International Medical Corps (US), University of St.Gallen (CH), Mahidol University (TH), New Cross Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Ministry of Health (JO), Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria (IT), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Genoa (IT), Yarmouk University (JO), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.