Increased Resource Utilization Post 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change

The 2018 United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change has shifted the way patients are bridged to heart transplant. The true cost of the policy change has not been examined using a large national database. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database (HCUP) National Inpatient Sampling database (2015-2022) was used to identify adult heart transplant recipients before and after the policy change, examining resource utilization between the two policy periods. There was an increase in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in the current era, along with a longer mean length of stay and more discharges to non-acute facilities. Despite similar inpatient mortality rates, the median total inpatient charge increased significantly (Old Policy: $685,263 vs. New Policy: $959,756; p < 0.001). The length of stay has also increased in the current policy period, and more patients are discharged to rehabilitation facility or places other than home. The increase in charge is also reflected in the total cost to the hospital (Old Policy: $172,935 ($122,611-$ 271,196) vs. New Policy: $241,277 ($167,353-$ 363,415), p<0.001). These findings further highlight increased resource utilization in current heart transplantation practice in the United States, warranting further discussion of healthcare utilization and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Transplantation
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70516
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased Resource Utilization Post 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change

Jaimin R. Trivedi, Erin M. Schumer, Toyokazu Endo, Joshua Crane et al.
Clinical Transplantation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Increased Resource Utilization Post 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change

Jaimin R. Trivedi, Erin M. Schumer, Toyokazu Endo, Joshua Crane, M. Gallo, Siddharth Pahwa, Mark S Slaughter, Vasta Vemuri
article en

Abstract

The 2018 United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change has shifted the way patients are bridged to heart transplant. The true cost of the policy change has not been examined using a large national database. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database (HCUP) National Inpatient Sampling database (2015-2022) was used to identify adult heart transplant recipients before and after the policy change, examining resource utilization between the two policy periods. There was an increase in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in the current era, along with a longer mean length of stay and more discharges to non-acute facilities. Despite similar inpatient mortality rates, the median total inpatient charge increased significantly (Old Policy: $685,263 vs. New Policy: $959,756; p < 0.001). The length of stay has also increased in the current policy period, and more patients are discharged to rehabilitation facility or places other than home. The increase in charge is also reflected in the total cost to the hospital (Old Policy: $172,935 ($122,611-$ 271,196) vs. New Policy: $241,277 ($167,353-$ 363,415), p<0.001). These findings further highlight increased resource utilization in current heart transplantation practice in the United States, warranting further discussion of healthcare utilization and outcomes.

Clinical TransplantationVol. 40(3)
University of Louisville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.