Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks

Accelerating energy-efficient renovations requires deeper understandings of how know-how (i.e. knowledge about how practically to get renovations done) is developed and shared. This paper, therefore, investigated the role of experimental, locality-specific knowledge networks in sharing renovation know-how. Knowledge networks have been suggested as a tool for collective, experiential, context-based learning, but have rarely been empirically investigated. Four knowledge networks (in Lithuania, Hungary, Spain and Ireland) were studied in partnership with municipalities and not-for-profit organisations. These networks brought together 140 citizens and professionals across 50 events, including meetings, workshops and hands-on site visits. Interviews (n = 40) with network members identified that four important types of know-how were shared: technical know-how; administrative/financial know-how; know-how for managing social relationships; and know-how about renovation actors. These findings challenge the narrow, technical framings of renovation knowledge that dominate research and policy by highlighting social dimensions of renovation know-how. Three lessons for effective sharing and development of know-how are the need to: bring together citizens and professionals; ensure learning is hands-on and situated; and create inclusive spaces. Knowledge networks offer a promising approach to accelerating efficient renovations. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Practical insights are offered on how to design and implement knowledge networks; an effective approach to sharing renovation know-how; and accelerating energy-efficient renovations. These insights are grounded in activities that integrated both tacit and explicit know-how, in that they combined explicit discussions with more implicit, interactive experiences, so that network members could develop in-depth, rounded understandings of renovation. Three lessons are provided for municipalities or community organisations that wish to implement similar interventions: (1) Bring together citizens and professionals: this includes citizens at various stages of renovation, and professionals across sectors, such construction contractors, advisors and community workers. (2) Ensure learning is hands-on and situated: a key insight is the value of eco-tours and home visits, which enable network members to experience renovations ‘first hand’. (3) Create inclusive spaces: design network activities to welcome and value diverse perspectives and foster trust. By building these inclusive, participatory local knowledge networks, practitioners can effectively enable citizens and professionals to learn from each other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings and Cities
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.675
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks

Rosie Robison, Ami Crowther, Sarah Royston, Chris Foulds et al.
Buildings and Cities
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks

Rosie Robison, Ami Crowther, Sarah Royston, Chris Foulds, Aggeliki Aggeli
article en

Abstract

Accelerating energy-efficient renovations requires deeper understandings of how know-how (i.e. knowledge about how practically to get renovations done) is developed and shared. This paper, therefore, investigated the role of experimental, locality-specific knowledge networks in sharing renovation know-how. Knowledge networks have been suggested as a tool for collective, experiential, context-based learning, but have rarely been empirically investigated. Four knowledge networks (in Lithuania, Hungary, Spain and Ireland) were studied in partnership with municipalities and not-for-profit organisations. These networks brought together 140 citizens and professionals across 50 events, including meetings, workshops and hands-on site visits. Interviews (n = 40) with network members identified that four important types of know-how were shared: technical know-how; administrative/financial know-how; know-how for managing social relationships; and know-how about renovation actors. These findings challenge the narrow, technical framings of renovation knowledge that dominate research and policy by highlighting social dimensions of renovation know-how. Three lessons for effective sharing and development of know-how are the need to: bring together citizens and professionals; ensure learning is hands-on and situated; and create inclusive spaces. Knowledge networks offer a promising approach to accelerating efficient renovations. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Practical insights are offered on how to design and implement knowledge networks; an effective approach to sharing renovation know-how; and accelerating energy-efficient renovations. These insights are grounded in activities that integrated both tacit and explicit know-how, in that they combined explicit discussions with more implicit, interactive experiences, so that network members could develop in-depth, rounded understandings of renovation. Three lessons are provided for municipalities or community organisations that wish to implement similar interventions: (1) Bring together citizens and professionals: this includes citizens at various stages of renovation, and professionals across sectors, such construction contractors, advisors and community workers. (2) Ensure learning is hands-on and situated: a key insight is the value of eco-tours and home visits, which enable network members to experience renovations ‘first hand’. (3) Create inclusive spaces: design network activities to welcome and value diverse perspectives and foster trust. By building these inclusive, participatory local knowledge networks, practitioners can effectively enable citizens and professionals to learn from each other.

Buildings and CitiesVol. 7(1)
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.