Global citizenship education and claims of human justice

Though the literature on global citizenship education (GCE) is extensive, our own work highlights GCE as a form of autonomous, deliberative and decolonial praxis aimed at cultivating social justice. However, a survey of contemporary cases of human rights abuse, most notably the ongoing atrocities in North Africa, Palestine and Ukraine, reveals persistent, systemic obstacles to realizing that vision. In this article, we revisit a conception of GCE as inherently political praxis. We argue, firstly, that gross human rights violations not only underscore the moral urgency underpinning GCE but also expose the structural barriers that compromise its enactment. Secondly, by examining how entrenched power asymmetries, geopolitical conflicts and state-sanctioned violence thwart democratic deliberation and local agency, we demonstrate that without confronting these realities head-on, GCE risks remaining little more than an aspirational ideal. Thirdly, we propose a framework of critical solidarity, one that integrates localized action with transnational advocacy, to bridge the gap between normative commitments and on-the-ground possibilities. A preview of this article was shared with the authors of the following commentaries in advance, with the intention that the article, commentary, and response be released concurrently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00194_1
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global citizenship education and claims of human justice

Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

Global citizenship education and claims of human justice

Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid
article en

Abstract

Though the literature on global citizenship education (GCE) is extensive, our own work highlights GCE as a form of autonomous, deliberative and decolonial praxis aimed at cultivating social justice. However, a survey of contemporary cases of human rights abuse, most notably the ongoing atrocities in North Africa, Palestine and Ukraine, reveals persistent, systemic obstacles to realizing that vision. In this article, we revisit a conception of GCE as inherently political praxis. We argue, firstly, that gross human rights violations not only underscore the moral urgency underpinning GCE but also expose the structural barriers that compromise its enactment. Secondly, by examining how entrenched power asymmetries, geopolitical conflicts and state-sanctioned violence thwart democratic deliberation and local agency, we demonstrate that without confronting these realities head-on, GCE risks remaining little more than an aspirational ideal. Thirdly, we propose a framework of critical solidarity, one that integrates localized action with transnational advocacy, to bridge the gap between normative commitments and on-the-ground possibilities. A preview of this article was shared with the authors of the following commentaries in advance, with the intention that the article, commentary, and response be released concurrently.

Citizenship Teaching and LearningVol. 20(3)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global citizenship education and claims of human justice — Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid · Citizenship Teaching and Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS