Guided Unconditional and Conditional Generative Models for Super‐Resolution and Inference of Quasi‐Geostrophic Turbulence

Abstract Typically, numerical simulations of Earth systems are coarse, and Earth observations are sparse and gappy. We apply four generative diffusion modeling approaches to super‐resolution and inference of forced two‐dimensional quasi‐geostrophic turbulence on the ‐plane from coarse, sparse, and gappy observations. Two guided approaches minimally adapt a pre‐trained unconditional model: SDEdit modifies the initial condition, and Diffusion Posterior Sampling (DPS) modifies the reverse diffusion process's score. Two conditional approaches, a vanilla variant and classifier‐free guidance, require training with paired high‐resolution and observation data. We consider multiple test cases spanning: two regimes, eddy and anisotropic‐jet turbulence; two Reynolds numbers, and ; and two observation types, coarse‐resolution fields and coarse, sparse and gappy observations. Our comprehensive skill metrics include norms of the reconstructed vorticity fields, turbulence statistical quantities, and quantifications of the super‐resolved probabilistic ensembles and their errors. We also study the sensitivity to tuning parameters such as guidance strength. Results show that the generated super‐resolution fields of SDEdit are unphysical, while those of DPS are reasonable but with smoothed fine‐scale features; however, neither of these lower‐cost models propagates observational information effectively to unobserved regions. The two conditional models require re‐training, but reconstruct missing fine‐scale features, are cycle‐consistent with observations, and predict correct turbulence statistics, including the tails. Further, their mean errors are highly correlated with and predictable from their ensemble standard deviations. Results highlight the trade‐offs between ease of implementation, fidelity (sharpness), and cycle‐consistency of the diffusion models, and offer practical guidance for deployment in geophysical inverse problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ms005324
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guided Unconditional and Conditional Generative Models for Super‐Resolution and Inference of Quasi‐Geostrophic Turbulence

Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux, Anantha Babu, Akhil Sadam
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Guided Unconditional and Conditional Generative Models for Super‐Resolution and Inference of Quasi‐Geostrophic Turbulence

Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux, Anantha Babu, Akhil Sadam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Typically, numerical simulations of Earth systems are coarse, and Earth observations are sparse and gappy. We apply four generative diffusion modeling approaches to super‐resolution and inference of forced two‐dimensional quasi‐geostrophic turbulence on the ‐plane from coarse, sparse, and gappy observations. Two guided approaches minimally adapt a pre‐trained unconditional model: SDEdit modifies the initial condition, and Diffusion Posterior Sampling (DPS) modifies the reverse diffusion process's score. Two conditional approaches, a vanilla variant and classifier‐free guidance, require training with paired high‐resolution and observation data. We consider multiple test cases spanning: two regimes, eddy and anisotropic‐jet turbulence; two Reynolds numbers, and ; and two observation types, coarse‐resolution fields and coarse, sparse and gappy observations. Our comprehensive skill metrics include norms of the reconstructed vorticity fields, turbulence statistical quantities, and quantifications of the super‐resolved probabilistic ensembles and their errors. We also study the sensitivity to tuning parameters such as guidance strength. Results show that the generated super‐resolution fields of SDEdit are unphysical, while those of DPS are reasonable but with smoothed fine‐scale features; however, neither of these lower‐cost models propagates observational information effectively to unobserved regions. The two conditional models require re‐training, but reconstruct missing fine‐scale features, are cycle‐consistent with observations, and predict correct turbulence statistics, including the tails. Further, their mean errors are highly correlated with and predictable from their ensemble standard deviations. Results highlight the trade‐offs between ease of implementation, fidelity (sharpness), and cycle‐consistency of the diffusion models, and offer practical guidance for deployment in geophysical inverse problems.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsVol. 18(3)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.