Synergistic effects of carbonated water flooding coupled with surfactant for EOR and CO2 storage: Pore-scale mechanisms and influencing factors analysis

Active carbonated water (ACW) flooding combines the benefits of carbonated water (CW) and surfactant flooding, simultaneously enhancing oil recovery and facilitating CO 2 storage. Nevertheless, the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) mechanisms of ACW remain insufficiently understood, and neither its CO 2 storage performance nor its pore-scale oil displacement characterization have yet to be investigated. Additionally, the influence of different factors on the performance of ACW has not been systematically studied. In this study, core flooding and nuclear magnetic resonance scanning experiments were conducted to elucidate the EOR mechanisms of ACW, clarify for the first time its CO 2 storage performance and pore-scale oil displacement characterization, and examine the influence of various factors on its effectiveness. The results demonstrated that CW flooding enhanced the oil recovery by 12.24% compared to water flooding (46.19%). By leveraging the synergistic effects of CW and surfactant, ACW further increased oil recovery to 64.55%, with pore-scale recovery of 72.22%, 50.77%, and 29.29% for macropores, mesopores, and micropores, respectively, representing increases of 15.77%, 15.05%, and 10.39% relative to water flooding. Furthermore, both CW and ACW demonstrated effective CO 2 storage, with dissolution trapping emerging as a critical mechanism. Compared to the CO 2 storage efficiency of CW at 50.57%, ACW showed a higher efficiency of 52.84%. Within the parameter ranges studied, the oil recovery and CO 2 storage efficiency of ACW both increased with decreasing injection rate and with increasing permeability and surfactant concentration. Correlation analysis revealed that for both metrics, permeability had the most significant influence, followed by surfactant concentration and injection rate. This work provides new insights into the potential of ACW flooding for simultaneous EOR and CO 2 storage, offering practical guidance for its application in low-permeability reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2026.03.044
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic effects of carbonated water flooding coupled with surfactant for EOR and CO2 storage: Pore-scale mechanisms and influencing factors analysis

Haifeng Yang, Jiabang Song, Huiting Tang, Xiaoying Han et al.
Petroleum Science
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Synergistic effects of carbonated water flooding coupled with surfactant for EOR and CO2 storage: Pore-scale mechanisms and influencing factors analysis

Haifeng Yang, Jiabang Song, Huiting Tang, Xiaoying Han, Peng Song, Yu-Meng Wang, Hai-Yang Yu, Yang Wang
article en

Abstract

Active carbonated water (ACW) flooding combines the benefits of carbonated water (CW) and surfactant flooding, simultaneously enhancing oil recovery and facilitating CO 2 storage. Nevertheless, the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) mechanisms of ACW remain insufficiently understood, and neither its CO 2 storage performance nor its pore-scale oil displacement characterization have yet to be investigated. Additionally, the influence of different factors on the performance of ACW has not been systematically studied. In this study, core flooding and nuclear magnetic resonance scanning experiments were conducted to elucidate the EOR mechanisms of ACW, clarify for the first time its CO 2 storage performance and pore-scale oil displacement characterization, and examine the influence of various factors on its effectiveness. The results demonstrated that CW flooding enhanced the oil recovery by 12.24% compared to water flooding (46.19%). By leveraging the synergistic effects of CW and surfactant, ACW further increased oil recovery to 64.55%, with pore-scale recovery of 72.22%, 50.77%, and 29.29% for macropores, mesopores, and micropores, respectively, representing increases of 15.77%, 15.05%, and 10.39% relative to water flooding. Furthermore, both CW and ACW demonstrated effective CO 2 storage, with dissolution trapping emerging as a critical mechanism. Compared to the CO 2 storage efficiency of CW at 50.57%, ACW showed a higher efficiency of 52.84%. Within the parameter ranges studied, the oil recovery and CO 2 storage efficiency of ACW both increased with decreasing injection rate and with increasing permeability and surfactant concentration. Correlation analysis revealed that for both metrics, permeability had the most significant influence, followed by surfactant concentration and injection rate. This work provides new insights into the potential of ACW flooding for simultaneous EOR and CO 2 storage, offering practical guidance for its application in low-permeability reservoirs.

Petroleum Science
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.