Competing Risk Survival Analysis of Time to In‐Hospital Recovery or Death Among COVID‐19 Patients: A Hospital‐Based Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Southeast Ethiopia

ABSTRACT Background and Aims In‐hospital death and recovery are competing risks in COVID‐19 patients, complicating prognosis. While international prognostic scores exist, their reliance on complex biomarkers limits their utility in resource‐constrained settings. This study aimed to estimate the duration and identify determinants of in‐hospital outcomes in southeast Ethiopia and to develop a clinically accessible risk stratification tool. Methods Data from 827 confirmed COVID‐19 patients (October 2022–May 2023) across six treatment centers were analyzed using the Fine‐Gray Competing Risk Survival Analysis (CRSA). Additionally, a novel “Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score” was developed using readily available bedside clinical parameters (age, comorbidity, and antibiotic use) and validated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Overall, 139/827 (17%) died, and 516/827 (62%) recovered. Risk of death was significantly higher for patients aged ≥ 50 years (acsHR = 2.62; 95%CI: 1.29, 5.29; p < 0.001) and those with an immunocompromised state (acsHR= 1.46; 95%CI: 1.08, 1.98; p = 0.014). Median time to death was 5 days. The “Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score” demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.65. At an optimal cutoff of ≥ 4, the score achieved a sensitivity of 47.2%, specificity of 73.2%, and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 83.5%. Conclusion Advanced age and immunocompromised status significantly increase mortality risk. The Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score provides a clinically validated, high‐NPV triage tool suitable for resource‐limited settings, facilitating the early identification of high‐risk patients and more efficient resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72191
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing Risk Survival Analysis of Time to In‐Hospital Recovery or Death Among COVID‐19 Patients: A Hospital‐Based Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Southeast Ethiopia

Abdurehman Kalu, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Abdurehman Tune, Abay Kibret et al.
Health Science Reports
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Competing Risk Survival Analysis of Time to In‐Hospital Recovery or Death Among COVID‐19 Patients: A Hospital‐Based Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Southeast Ethiopia

Abdurehman Kalu, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Abdurehman Tune, Abay Kibret, Zerihun Abera, Addis Wordofa, Yonas Mulugeta, Ayalneh Demissie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims In‐hospital death and recovery are competing risks in COVID‐19 patients, complicating prognosis. While international prognostic scores exist, their reliance on complex biomarkers limits their utility in resource‐constrained settings. This study aimed to estimate the duration and identify determinants of in‐hospital outcomes in southeast Ethiopia and to develop a clinically accessible risk stratification tool. Methods Data from 827 confirmed COVID‐19 patients (October 2022–May 2023) across six treatment centers were analyzed using the Fine‐Gray Competing Risk Survival Analysis (CRSA). Additionally, a novel “Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score” was developed using readily available bedside clinical parameters (age, comorbidity, and antibiotic use) and validated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Overall, 139/827 (17%) died, and 516/827 (62%) recovered. Risk of death was significantly higher for patients aged ≥ 50 years (acsHR = 2.62; 95%CI: 1.29, 5.29; p < 0.001) and those with an immunocompromised state (acsHR= 1.46; 95%CI: 1.08, 1.98; p = 0.014). Median time to death was 5 days. The “Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score” demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.65. At an optimal cutoff of ≥ 4, the score achieved a sensitivity of 47.2%, specificity of 73.2%, and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 83.5%. Conclusion Advanced age and immunocompromised status significantly increase mortality risk. The Asella COVID‐19 Risk Score provides a clinically validated, high‐NPV triage tool suitable for resource‐limited settings, facilitating the early identification of high‐risk patients and more efficient resource allocation.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(3)
Asossa University (ET), Department of Public Health (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.