Comparison of the Pain Score Following Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Extraction of Lower Posterior Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: We aimed to compare pain scores among patients undergoing lower posterior tooth extraction who were anesthetized with either articaine local infusion or lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Method: The study sample was randomly divided into two groups (30 for each). The first group was anesthetized using 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline by IANB, while the second group was anesthetized using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline via buccal and lingual infiltration. A visual analog scale was used to assess pain. Results: Our results showed the type of anesthesia (lidocaine or articaine) was not a significant predicator for pain (estimate: 0.882, P = 0.2433, odds ratio [OR]: 2.415). Female subjects and lower ages reported higher pain scores, but gender (estimate: −2.007, P = 0.0258, OR: 0.134), and age (estimate: −0.134, P = 0.0147, OR: 0.875) were significant predicators for pain. Conclusion: Patients undergoing lower posterior tooth extraction, who were anesthetized with either articaine local infusion or lidocaine IANB, reported the same pain scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Hypotheses
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_55_24
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Pain Score Following Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Extraction of Lower Posterior Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Amjed Fouad Hussien, Radhwan Abdulkareem, Dhay Haider M. Hassan
Dental Hypotheses
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
article

Comparison of the Pain Score Following Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Extraction of Lower Posterior Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Amjed Fouad Hussien, Radhwan Abdulkareem, Dhay Haider M. Hassan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare pain scores among patients undergoing lower posterior tooth extraction who were anesthetized with either articaine local infusion or lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Method: The study sample was randomly divided into two groups (30 for each). The first group was anesthetized using 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline by IANB, while the second group was anesthetized using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline via buccal and lingual infiltration. A visual analog scale was used to assess pain. Results: Our results showed the type of anesthesia (lidocaine or articaine) was not a significant predicator for pain (estimate: 0.882, P = 0.2433, odds ratio [OR]: 2.415). Female subjects and lower ages reported higher pain scores, but gender (estimate: −2.007, P = 0.0258, OR: 0.134), and age (estimate: −0.134, P = 0.0147, OR: 0.875) were significant predicators for pain. Conclusion: Patients undergoing lower posterior tooth extraction, who were anesthetized with either articaine local infusion or lidocaine IANB, reported the same pain scores.

Dental HypothesesVol. 17(1)
Ahl Al Bayt University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.