We Are Good at Detecting Stable-Diffusion-Generated Deepfakes but Not StyleGAN-Generated or Face-Swapped Deepfakes

Some face images on social media are generated by algorithms. Recent research found StyleGAN-generated faces are indistinguishable from real faces for humans under unlimited viewing duration. However, it is unclear whether different algorithms and brief exposure (often in social media) affect human detection. Using a 6 (viewing duration: 17–1000 ms) × 4 (image type: real, Stable-Diffusion, StyleGAN, face-swapped) within-subject design, we investigated how viewing duration and deepfake type jointly shape human detection and attention. Thirty-eight participants viewed faces to judge whether they are AI-generated, with eye movement tracked. Generalized Linear Mixed Models (N = 38) showed image type, viewing duration, and their interaction significantly influenced detection accuracy (all p ’s < .001). Stable-Diffusion-generated and real images were accurately identified even at the shortest duration (accuracy: 83-88% all viewing durations), while StyleGAN-generated and face-swapped images were difficult to detect (accuracy: 4-11% and 12-29%, respectively). Interestingly, detection accuracy improved with longer viewing duration for face-swapped images but declined for StyleGAN-generated images. Eye movement analysis (N = 37) showed face-swapped images elicited fewer-but-prolonged fixations with nose-focused patterns, suggesting more holistic processing strategy used for swapped faces. Compared with five off-the-shelf deepfake detection models, human performance was comparable to that of the second-best model across all deepfake types. As the first study to systematically test three major deepfake types from ultra-brief to moderate viewing durations, our study fills a gap in prior research that is limited to single deepfake types or long durations, improving understanding of face perception mechanisms in the age of AI. • Stable-Diffusion-generated faces could be detected as fake with 17ms-viewing. • StyleGAN-generated and face-swapped images were easily misidentified as real. • Viewing duration significantly affected human detection of deepfake. • Viewing duration and deepfake type had an interaction effect on detection. • People tend to fixate on the nose region when detecting deepfakes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101035
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Are Good at Detecting Stable-Diffusion-Generated Deepfakes but Not StyleGAN-Generated or Face-Swapped Deepfakes

Shanghong Li, Zihao ZHAO, Adams Wai Kin KONG, Mingzhi LYU et al.
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
article

We Are Good at Detecting Stable-Diffusion-Generated Deepfakes but Not StyleGAN-Generated or Face-Swapped Deepfakes

Shanghong Li, Zihao ZHAO, Adams Wai Kin KONG, Mingzhi LYU, Hong XU, Ian McLOUGHLIN
article en

Abstract

Some face images on social media are generated by algorithms. Recent research found StyleGAN-generated faces are indistinguishable from real faces for humans under unlimited viewing duration. However, it is unclear whether different algorithms and brief exposure (often in social media) affect human detection. Using a 6 (viewing duration: 17–1000 ms) × 4 (image type: real, Stable-Diffusion, StyleGAN, face-swapped) within-subject design, we investigated how viewing duration and deepfake type jointly shape human detection and attention. Thirty-eight participants viewed faces to judge whether they are AI-generated, with eye movement tracked. Generalized Linear Mixed Models (N = 38) showed image type, viewing duration, and their interaction significantly influenced detection accuracy (all p ’s < .001). Stable-Diffusion-generated and real images were accurately identified even at the shortest duration (accuracy: 83-88% all viewing durations), while StyleGAN-generated and face-swapped images were difficult to detect (accuracy: 4-11% and 12-29%, respectively). Interestingly, detection accuracy improved with longer viewing duration for face-swapped images but declined for StyleGAN-generated images. Eye movement analysis (N = 37) showed face-swapped images elicited fewer-but-prolonged fixations with nose-focused patterns, suggesting more holistic processing strategy used for swapped faces. Compared with five off-the-shelf deepfake detection models, human performance was comparable to that of the second-best model across all deepfake types. As the first study to systematically test three major deepfake types from ultra-brief to moderate viewing durations, our study fills a gap in prior research that is limited to single deepfake types or long durations, improving understanding of face perception mechanisms in the age of AI. • Stable-Diffusion-generated faces could be detected as fake with 17ms-viewing. • StyleGAN-generated and face-swapped images were easily misidentified as real. • Viewing duration significantly affected human detection of deepfake. • Viewing duration and deepfake type had an interaction effect on detection. • People tend to fixate on the nose region when detecting deepfakes.

Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.