Commentary on ‘Global citizenship education and claims of human justice’

The article ‘Global citizenship education and claims of human justice’ presents a compelling argument for the role of global citizenship education (GCE) as a transformative praxis aimed at fostering social justice and human rights in the face of systemic oppression. By examining contemporary cases of human rights abuses in North Africa, Palestine and Ukraine, the authors highlight the structural barriers that impede the realization of GCE’s ideals. The article is structured around three key arguments: the moral urgency of GCE in light of human rights violations, the obstacles posed by power asymmetries and state violence, and the proposed framework of ‘critical solidarity’ to bridge normative commitments with practical action. This commentary will critically engage with these arguments, assess the strengths and limitations of the article, and reflect on the broader implications of GCE in today’s geopolitical landscape. A preview of Waghid and Bosio’s article was shared with me in advance for the purpose of preparing this commentary, with the intention that the article, commentary, and response be released concurrently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00196_7
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary on ‘Global citizenship education and claims of human justice’

Michael A. Peters
Citizenship Teaching and Learning
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

Commentary on ‘Global citizenship education and claims of human justice’

Michael A. Peters
article en

Abstract

The article ‘Global citizenship education and claims of human justice’ presents a compelling argument for the role of global citizenship education (GCE) as a transformative praxis aimed at fostering social justice and human rights in the face of systemic oppression. By examining contemporary cases of human rights abuses in North Africa, Palestine and Ukraine, the authors highlight the structural barriers that impede the realization of GCE’s ideals. The article is structured around three key arguments: the moral urgency of GCE in light of human rights violations, the obstacles posed by power asymmetries and state violence, and the proposed framework of ‘critical solidarity’ to bridge normative commitments with practical action. This commentary will critically engage with these arguments, assess the strengths and limitations of the article, and reflect on the broader implications of GCE in today’s geopolitical landscape. A preview of Waghid and Bosio’s article was shared with me in advance for the purpose of preparing this commentary, with the intention that the article, commentary, and response be released concurrently.

Citizenship Teaching and LearningVol. 20(3)
University of Waikato (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.