Laughter-inducing interventions for workplace stress management: a scoping review

Mental health at work is a public health priority. Previous studies in the general population suggest that laughter-inducing interventions may support mental health. Their workplace potential warrants a scoping review. The aim of this study was to document, in the literature, the components and effectiveness of laughter-inducing interventions in the workplace. A structured search strategy was applied to 6 databases. Studies assessing laughter-inducing interventions among workers using interventional designs were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and appraised studies using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis was performed to answer the research questions. Out of the 613 records identified, twenty-five studies were included with samples of varying sizes (n=7-200 participants) and professions. Laughter-inducing interventions included introduction (background, rationale) (n=7), laughter exercises (n=19), breathing (n=15), warm-up (n=10), chanting (n=8), relaxation (n=7), movements (n=6), games (n=3), and expression of feelings or feedback (n=4). Intervention formats varied in sessions (1-28), duration (10-90 min), frequency (daily to monthly), and length (1-90 days). The most frequently investigated outcome was stress (n=16) with results generally statistically significant (n=12). There was a paucity of data informing the implementation process. The quality appraisal revealed poor quality with risks of selection and/or confounding bias (n=17/17 among non-randomized studies) and risks of information and/or selection bias (n=5/6 in randomized studies). While findings suggest that laughter-inducing interventions may be promising for reducing workplace stress, most included studies were of poor methodological quality, warranting cautious interpretation. Further research is needed due to methodological heterogeneity and limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety and Health at Work
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2026.03.006
Primary Topic
Humor Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laughter-inducing interventions for workplace stress management: a scoping review

Léonie Matteau, Marc Medrano, Juliette Demers, Mahée GILBERT-OUIMET et al.
Safety and Health at Work
Humor Studies and Applications
article

Laughter-inducing interventions for workplace stress management: a scoping review

Léonie Matteau, Marc Medrano, Juliette Demers, Mahée GILBERT-OUIMET, Isabelle TOUPIN, Jenny JIN, Theo STEFAN, Annie LEBLANC
article en

Abstract

Mental health at work is a public health priority. Previous studies in the general population suggest that laughter-inducing interventions may support mental health. Their workplace potential warrants a scoping review. The aim of this study was to document, in the literature, the components and effectiveness of laughter-inducing interventions in the workplace. A structured search strategy was applied to 6 databases. Studies assessing laughter-inducing interventions among workers using interventional designs were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and appraised studies using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis was performed to answer the research questions. Out of the 613 records identified, twenty-five studies were included with samples of varying sizes (n=7-200 participants) and professions. Laughter-inducing interventions included introduction (background, rationale) (n=7), laughter exercises (n=19), breathing (n=15), warm-up (n=10), chanting (n=8), relaxation (n=7), movements (n=6), games (n=3), and expression of feelings or feedback (n=4). Intervention formats varied in sessions (1-28), duration (10-90 min), frequency (daily to monthly), and length (1-90 days). The most frequently investigated outcome was stress (n=16) with results generally statistically significant (n=12). There was a paucity of data informing the implementation process. The quality appraisal revealed poor quality with risks of selection and/or confounding bias (n=17/17 among non-randomized studies) and risks of information and/or selection bias (n=5/6 in randomized studies). While findings suggest that laughter-inducing interventions may be promising for reducing workplace stress, most included studies were of poor methodological quality, warranting cautious interpretation. Further research is needed due to methodological heterogeneity and limitations.

Safety and Health at Work
Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Humor Studies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.