Money and Technology as Modern Magic

Abstract: The modern distinction between technology and magic relies on the conceptual separation of technology and economy. However, as the efficacy of modern technology is contingent on the world market, and the alchemy of market exchange is a social convention indistinguishable from magic, technologies are ultimately societal strategies implicating subjective intentions, relations of power, and unequal exchange. This conclusion harmonizes with Bruno Latour's observation that humans use artifacts to create more extensive social systems but is also aligned with the Marxian notion of fetishism (from a Portuguese word for magic), which Latour has rejected. Beyond what Marx called money fetishism and commodity fetishism, modern people tend to be deluded by technological fetishism: the illusion that technological artifacts should be conceptually excised from the global social relations of exchange which make them possible, and which they reproduce. The article compares ancient bronze metallurgy with eighteenth-century steam engines as examples of how technologies tend to be understood as exhaustively accounted for by reference to esoteric knowledge systems, rather than acknowledging the systems of long-distance exchange on which they depend. In both cases, fetishized artifacts are ontologically excised from social relations. This is also the case with digital technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Magic, ritual, and witchcraft
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/mrw.2025.a985971
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Money and Technology as Modern Magic

Alf Hornborg
Magic, ritual, and witchcraft
Digital Media and Philosophy
article

Money and Technology as Modern Magic

Alf Hornborg
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The modern distinction between technology and magic relies on the conceptual separation of technology and economy. However, as the efficacy of modern technology is contingent on the world market, and the alchemy of market exchange is a social convention indistinguishable from magic, technologies are ultimately societal strategies implicating subjective intentions, relations of power, and unequal exchange. This conclusion harmonizes with Bruno Latour's observation that humans use artifacts to create more extensive social systems but is also aligned with the Marxian notion of fetishism (from a Portuguese word for magic), which Latour has rejected. Beyond what Marx called money fetishism and commodity fetishism, modern people tend to be deluded by technological fetishism: the illusion that technological artifacts should be conceptually excised from the global social relations of exchange which make them possible, and which they reproduce. The article compares ancient bronze metallurgy with eighteenth-century steam engines as examples of how technologies tend to be understood as exhaustively accounted for by reference to esoteric knowledge systems, rather than acknowledging the systems of long-distance exchange on which they depend. In both cases, fetishized artifacts are ontologically excised from social relations. This is also the case with digital technologies.

Magic, ritual, and witchcraftVol. 20(3)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Digital Media and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.