The Impact of Electronic Benefit Transfer on Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of the implementation of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation using Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) data from 1992 to 2007. The findings indicate a significant increase (1.6% for our benchmark model) in SNAP participation post‐EBT implementation, but smaller in magnitude compared with previous studies. The results also show significant differences in impacts across different demographic and socioeconomic groups. The event study results suggest that these effects may not be instantaneous, and show pronounced and sustainable impacts approximately 2 years after statewide EBT implementation. Understanding these nuanced impacts is crucial for policymakers to better tailor outreach and implementation efforts across different populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Economics
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70109
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Electronic Benefit Transfer on Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Miguel Ignacio Gomez, Yuqing Zheng, Harry M. Kaiser, Lingxiao Wang et al.
Agricultural Economics
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

The Impact of Electronic Benefit Transfer on Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Miguel Ignacio Gomez, Yuqing Zheng, Harry M. Kaiser, Lingxiao Wang, Diansheng Dong, Pei Zhou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of the implementation of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation using Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) data from 1992 to 2007. The findings indicate a significant increase (1.6% for our benchmark model) in SNAP participation post‐EBT implementation, but smaller in magnitude compared with previous studies. The results also show significant differences in impacts across different demographic and socioeconomic groups. The event study results suggest that these effects may not be instantaneous, and show pronounced and sustainable impacts approximately 2 years after statewide EBT implementation. Understanding these nuanced impacts is crucial for policymakers to better tailor outreach and implementation efforts across different populations.

Agricultural EconomicsVol. 57(2)
Economic Research Service (US), University of Kentucky (US), Cornell University (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.