AI Readiness is Not Enough: Towards Purpose-led AI Governance in Projects

AI readiness is increasingly treated as a central condition for successful AI deployment in projects, an emphasis that can privilege capability, adoption, and performance while leaving questions of purpose largely unaddressed. Drawing on Industry 5.0 as a normative point of reference, the work redirects attention to the ends AI deployment is expected to serve within projects. The concept of dual bounded rationality is introduced to interpret the interaction of human and algorithmic judgement under conditions in which AI capability is uneven and often opaque to users. From this perspective, governing AI in projects appears not only as a matter of preparation and adoption, but also of orientation and value. A purpose-led perspective is therefore offered as a contribution to current debate in order to broaden understanding of project AI governance in which questions of purpose, judgement, and accountability become more explicit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Project Management
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102850
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Readiness is Not Enough: Towards Purpose-led AI Governance in Projects

Nicholas Dacre
International Journal of Project Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Readiness is Not Enough: Towards Purpose-led AI Governance in Projects

Nicholas Dacre
article en

Abstract

AI readiness is increasingly treated as a central condition for successful AI deployment in projects, an emphasis that can privilege capability, adoption, and performance while leaving questions of purpose largely unaddressed. Drawing on Industry 5.0 as a normative point of reference, the work redirects attention to the ends AI deployment is expected to serve within projects. The concept of dual bounded rationality is introduced to interpret the interaction of human and algorithmic judgement under conditions in which AI capability is uneven and often opaque to users. From this perspective, governing AI in projects appears not only as a matter of preparation and adoption, but also of orientation and value. A purpose-led perspective is therefore offered as a contribution to current debate in order to broaden understanding of project AI governance in which questions of purpose, judgement, and accountability become more explicit.

International Journal of Project Management
University of Southampton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.