Parsing Heterogeneity: Sex Differences in Youth Antisocial Behavior

This study examined sources of heterogeneity in antisocial behaviors in a large-scale and nationally representative sample of n = 7655 youth from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. Separate latent profile analyses were conducted for males and females using indicators of physical aggression, relational aggression, callous-unemotional (CU) traits, and conduct symptom severity. Distinct profiles emerged within each sex. Among females, profiles were primarily differentiated by levels of CU traits, whereas among males, physical aggression played a more central role in distinguishing groups. In both sexes, a higher-risk profile characterized by elevated aggression and/or CU traits was identified alongside a lower-severity marked by minimal conduct problems and aggression. Profiles also differed significantly in overall distress, with the higher-risk male profile demonstrating the greatest distress and the lower-risk female profile the least. Findings highlight meaningful sex-specific configurations of aggression and CU traits and underscore the importance of person-centered, sex-informed approaches to developmental models, assessment, and intervention in youth with antisocial behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aggressive Behavior
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.70065
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parsing Heterogeneity: Sex Differences in Youth Antisocial Behavior

Tess M. S. Neal, Monica A. Marsee, Maya A. Irvin‐Vitela
Aggressive Behavior
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Parsing Heterogeneity: Sex Differences in Youth Antisocial Behavior

Tess M. S. Neal, Monica A. Marsee, Maya A. Irvin‐Vitela
article en

Abstract

This study examined sources of heterogeneity in antisocial behaviors in a large-scale and nationally representative sample of n = 7655 youth from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. Separate latent profile analyses were conducted for males and females using indicators of physical aggression, relational aggression, callous-unemotional (CU) traits, and conduct symptom severity. Distinct profiles emerged within each sex. Among females, profiles were primarily differentiated by levels of CU traits, whereas among males, physical aggression played a more central role in distinguishing groups. In both sexes, a higher-risk profile characterized by elevated aggression and/or CU traits was identified alongside a lower-severity marked by minimal conduct problems and aggression. Profiles also differed significantly in overall distress, with the higher-risk male profile demonstrating the greatest distress and the lower-risk female profile the least. Findings highlight meaningful sex-specific configurations of aggression and CU traits and underscore the importance of person-centered, sex-informed approaches to developmental models, assessment, and intervention in youth with antisocial behavior.

Aggressive BehaviorVol. 52(2)
Iowa State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parsing Heterogeneity: Sex Differences in Youth Antisocial Behavior — Tess M. S. Neal, Monica A. Marsee, et al. · Aggressive Behavior (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS