Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Turn: Philosophy and Jewish Thought

Kleinberg takes up the debate concerning the relationship between Levinas's Judaic and his more general philosophical writings, which Levinas published separately. This separation reproduces rather than addresses questions about Levinas's (and Judaism's) universal as against its particular concerns. In a double-column format, Kleinberg's study traces in one column Levinas's intellectual history as it turned to talmudic engagement after first encountering Western literature and philosophy; while a second column, printed alongside the first, undertakes its own commentary on Levinas's talmudic commentaries. This “double session” (in Derridean terms) is intended to unsettle and challenge philosophical habits, but the columns seem largely to miss each other. In both, the discourse is descriptive rather than analytical. What is offered is a good overview of Levinas's intellectual development as it touches on Jewish topics, exposing continued tensions between philosophical generalization and specificities of history and culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Common Knowledge
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-11984265
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Turn: Philosophy and Jewish Thought

Shira Wolosky
Common Knowledge
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Turn: Philosophy and Jewish Thought

Shira Wolosky
article en

Abstract

Kleinberg takes up the debate concerning the relationship between Levinas's Judaic and his more general philosophical writings, which Levinas published separately. This separation reproduces rather than addresses questions about Levinas's (and Judaism's) universal as against its particular concerns. In a double-column format, Kleinberg's study traces in one column Levinas's intellectual history as it turned to talmudic engagement after first encountering Western literature and philosophy; while a second column, printed alongside the first, undertakes its own commentary on Levinas's talmudic commentaries. This “double session” (in Derridean terms) is intended to unsettle and challenge philosophical habits, but the columns seem largely to miss each other. In both, the discourse is descriptive rather than analytical. What is offered is a good overview of Levinas's intellectual development as it touches on Jewish topics, exposing continued tensions between philosophical generalization and specificities of history and culture.

Common KnowledgeVol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.