Big Data Price Discrimination: The Choice of First‐Mover Advantage

This paper explores the decision‐making mechanisms behind big data price discrimination on E‐commerce platforms. Specifically, we innovatively account for the heterogeneity of consumers and suppliers, using repeat purchase rates and the probability of detecting big data price discrimination to characterize consumers and differentiate suppliers by their bargaining power. Based on this, we developed a game‐theoretic model of platform decision‐making in big data price discrimination. Our research finds that, in an oligopolistic competitive environment, implementing big data price discrimination is a dominant strategic behavior for the platform. It sacrifices consumer welfare to provide platforms with a competitive advantage as first movers. Additionally, stronger bargaining power from suppliers helps mitigate consumer welfare losses. Furthermore, when considering consumer switching costs, our results indicate that even if platforms are caught engaging in big data price discrimination, high switching costs buffer the loss of profits for the platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ddns/6687209
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Big Data Price Discrimination: The Choice of First‐Mover Advantage

Xiao Li, Kunping Wang, Yanshuang Li
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Big Data Price Discrimination: The Choice of First‐Mover Advantage

Xiao Li, Kunping Wang, Yanshuang Li
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the decision‐making mechanisms behind big data price discrimination on E‐commerce platforms. Specifically, we innovatively account for the heterogeneity of consumers and suppliers, using repeat purchase rates and the probability of detecting big data price discrimination to characterize consumers and differentiate suppliers by their bargaining power. Based on this, we developed a game‐theoretic model of platform decision‐making in big data price discrimination. Our research finds that, in an oligopolistic competitive environment, implementing big data price discrimination is a dominant strategic behavior for the platform. It sacrifices consumer welfare to provide platforms with a competitive advantage as first movers. Additionally, stronger bargaining power from suppliers helps mitigate consumer welfare losses. Furthermore, when considering consumer switching costs, our results indicate that even if platforms are caught engaging in big data price discrimination, high switching costs buffer the loss of profits for the platforms.

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and SocietyVol. 2026(1)
Shenyang Aerospace University (CN), Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Big Data Price Discrimination: The Choice of First‐Mover Advantage — Xiao Li, Kunping Wang, et al. · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS