How Future-Proof is the DMA? A Case Study Of AI Agents

ABSTRACT The Digital Markets Act (DMA) was adopted to address known (competition) issues in digital markets. Its effectiveness with regard to emerging technologies—that is, its future-proofness—is therefore an open question. In this article, we tackle that question through a case study of AI agents. AI agents are the most consequential emerging technology on the horizon, with the potential both to disrupt existing gatekeepers and to create gatekeepers in their own right; however, policymakers did not consider the inclusion of AI agents when designing the DMA. We start by explaining the key building blocks of agentic AI and by identifying potential competition concerns. Next, we explore whether AI agents could fall within the DMA’s scope (as core platform services) and whether the ensuing obligations are meaningful when applied in this new context. We find that the DMA is surprisingly future-proof in the face of agentic AI, but we also make recommendations on interpretations and amendments of the DMA to ensure its future effectiveness and legal certainty.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhag005
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Future-Proof is the DMA? A Case Study Of AI Agents

Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

How Future-Proof is the DMA? A Case Study Of AI Agents

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Digital Markets Act (DMA) was adopted to address known (competition) issues in digital markets. Its effectiveness with regard to emerging technologies—that is, its future-proofness—is therefore an open question. In this article, we tackle that question through a case study of AI agents. AI agents are the most consequential emerging technology on the horizon, with the potential both to disrupt existing gatekeepers and to create gatekeepers in their own right; however, policymakers did not consider the inclusion of AI agents when designing the DMA. We start by explaining the key building blocks of agentic AI and by identifying potential competition concerns. Next, we explore whether AI agents could fall within the DMA’s scope (as core platform services) and whether the ensuing obligations are meaningful when applied in this new context. We find that the DMA is surprisingly future-proof in the face of agentic AI, but we also make recommendations on interpretations and amendments of the DMA to ensure its future effectiveness and legal certainty.

Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.