Formability Evaluation Based on Stress Triaxiality in Incremental Forming and Stretch Press Forming

The formability of die-based press forming (stretch forming) and that of incremental forming (IF) were compared using the ductile fracture equation and stress triaxiality to investigate whether IF’s superior formability could be accurately evaluated. Experiments were conducted to determine the fracture conditions of the test material in each forming method, and finite element method analysis was performed on the basis using experimental results to obtain the stress triaxiality. In press forming, the stress triaxiality remained nearly constant during forming, indicating that the evaluation using the ductile fracture equation was feasible. In IF, the stress triaxiality around the tool was found to be the same as that in press forming, making it difficult to evaluate its high formability using the ductile fracture equation. Focusing on the formed areas of the test material, the stress triaxiality was not constant and changed over time during the forming process. Damage analysis using GISSMO, which accounts for temporal variations in stress triaxiality, was performed. This analysis revealed that both IF and press forming could be effectively evaluated, and that IF’s superior formability could also be appropriately represented.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9773/sosei.250503
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formability Evaluation Based on Stress Triaxiality in Incremental Forming and Stretch Press Forming

Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Formability Evaluation Based on Stress Triaxiality in Incremental Forming and Stretch Press Forming

article en

Abstract

The formability of die-based press forming (stretch forming) and that of incremental forming (IF) were compared using the ductile fracture equation and stress triaxiality to investigate whether IF’s superior formability could be accurately evaluated. Experiments were conducted to determine the fracture conditions of the test material in each forming method, and finite element method analysis was performed on the basis using experimental results to obtain the stress triaxiality. In press forming, the stress triaxiality remained nearly constant during forming, indicating that the evaluation using the ductile fracture equation was feasible. In IF, the stress triaxiality around the tool was found to be the same as that in press forming, making it difficult to evaluate its high formability using the ductile fracture equation. Focusing on the formed areas of the test material, the stress triaxiality was not constant and changed over time during the forming process. Damage analysis using GISSMO, which accounts for temporal variations in stress triaxiality, was performed. This analysis revealed that both IF and press forming could be effectively evaluated, and that IF’s superior formability could also be appropriately represented.

Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of PlasticityVol. 67(782)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.