Socioeconomic Deprivation and Vocal Handicap in Adults With Voice Disorders

ABSTRACT Objective This study examined the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and quality of life as measured by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in adults with voice disorders. Methods A cross sectional design was utilized. One‐thousand one‐hundred and twenty adults with voice disorders were included in this study (mean age = 53.6, SD = 16.5; males = 429 females = 788). Patients were divided into the following diagnostic groups: muscle tension dysphonia (32%), benign vocal fold lesions (29.4%), laryngospasm (12.3%), vocal fold paralysis (11.1%), neurological voice disorders (6.2%), laryngeal cancer (5.9%), and presbyphonia (3%). VHI scores, Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia and Strain (GRBAS) ratings, age, sex, employment status, and smoking history were extracted from initial voice evaluations. Socioeconomic deprivation was measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Results Patients living in areas with the highest socioeconomic deprivation presented with greater total ( p < 0.001), functional ( p < 0.001), physical ( p < 0.001), and emotional VHI scores ( p < 0.001) when compared to those living in more affluent areas—even when controlling for dysphonia severity, age, sex, voice‐related diagnosis, employment status, and smoking history. The association between VHI and ADI was strongest for total score and emotional subscore, as VHI total scores increased by 0.32 (95% CI = 0.26–1.26, p < 0.001) and VHI Emotional scores increased by 0.18 (95% CI = 0.16–0.21, p < 0.001) for every 1‐point increase in ADI. Conclusions Patients living with socioeconomic deprivation experienced greater voice‐related handicap from voice disorders than those from more affluent backgrounds. Future work is needed to better characterize the relationship between quality of life and socioeconomic deprivation in those with voice disorders. Level of Evidence 3.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70510
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic Deprivation and Vocal Handicap in Adults With Voice Disorders

The Laryngoscope
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Socioeconomic Deprivation and Vocal Handicap in Adults With Voice Disorders

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study examined the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and quality of life as measured by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in adults with voice disorders. Methods A cross sectional design was utilized. One‐thousand one‐hundred and twenty adults with voice disorders were included in this study (mean age = 53.6, SD = 16.5; males = 429 females = 788). Patients were divided into the following diagnostic groups: muscle tension dysphonia (32%), benign vocal fold lesions (29.4%), laryngospasm (12.3%), vocal fold paralysis (11.1%), neurological voice disorders (6.2%), laryngeal cancer (5.9%), and presbyphonia (3%). VHI scores, Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia and Strain (GRBAS) ratings, age, sex, employment status, and smoking history were extracted from initial voice evaluations. Socioeconomic deprivation was measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Results Patients living in areas with the highest socioeconomic deprivation presented with greater total ( p < 0.001), functional ( p < 0.001), physical ( p < 0.001), and emotional VHI scores ( p < 0.001) when compared to those living in more affluent areas—even when controlling for dysphonia severity, age, sex, voice‐related diagnosis, employment status, and smoking history. The association between VHI and ADI was strongest for total score and emotional subscore, as VHI total scores increased by 0.32 (95% CI = 0.26–1.26, p < 0.001) and VHI Emotional scores increased by 0.18 (95% CI = 0.16–0.21, p < 0.001) for every 1‐point increase in ADI. Conclusions Patients living with socioeconomic deprivation experienced greater voice‐related handicap from voice disorders than those from more affluent backgrounds. Future work is needed to better characterize the relationship between quality of life and socioeconomic deprivation in those with voice disorders. Level of Evidence 3.

The Laryngoscope
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Socioeconomic Deprivation and Vocal Handicap in Adults With Voice Disorders · The Laryngoscope (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS